Thanks Avangi. I was wondering if the head was turned or not when shout occured. It is very clear now. Thanks.

Thanks yadoo86. I understand the expressions "Korean rice" and "the rice in Korea", but I find "the rice of Korea" somewhat odd. Your explanation, "the rice that Korea has", seems correct to me. But then,

Hi, What are the differences? "Tahitian fish" "the fish of Tahiti" "the fish in (the water of) Tahiti" Also "Korean rice" "the rice of Korea" "the rice in Korea" Thanks

Thanks for the detailed comment, CalifJim. I think I understand. It seems the first example you provided, the man could/should have done more than just a handshake, is the case here for the story I am reading. Thanks again.

In a story, after a handshake between a man and a woman is portrayed, it goes... "The polite handshake was the least he could do for her." What does the above sentence mean/imply? 1. The handshake was a little thing, but the only thing

Thanks rafaelinrio. So, in the expression "nothing to do for the next two days", "do for the next two days" is a unit, not "nothing for the next two days" ? This is where I got confused. I took that "for"

Thanks Mr. Micawber. It helped a lot. So, you take "(would you) like to" and "be interested in" as units, insted of "(would you) like" and "be interested". I think my question basically boilds down to this,

Questions about how you pause when you speak. This has to be related to how you understand the language, I suspect. Questions: Which is the better stopping point. "Would you like ... to come with me?" or "Would you like to ... come

Hi I have a question: "sleep for two hours" --- in this phrase, "for" expresses the duration. while, "nothing to do for the next two hours" --- in this phrase, "for" seems to express something else. (I

Thanks Oprahruru. So, generally laywers are someone to "phone", not to summon...? Or just the contex I provided specifically tells you so?