No, it's cerrtainly not the best choice.

Hi -- welcome to English Forums! Please try to use correct capitalization (Hi, I) and spelling (you) when you post here. Could you explain a little more what you are trying to say? None of the possibilities are very clear. For #1, possiblities

You've already said "to," at the beginning. Don't repeat it at the end. But you need to add "does": To whom does this pen belong? Now, I should let you know that while that sentece is quite correct, it sounds very

You're right, they're wrong. (The only time "her and her ex" would be correct is if the phrase was the object of preposition -- as in, "The property belonged to her and her ex.". ) Welcome to the Forum! Your instincts

It means he has pawned his guitar. A pawn shop will take an item and loan you money. If you pay the money back within a certain time (probably with interest) you can get your item back. If you don't pay back the loan, the pawn shop is free to

Yeah, that's better. Oddly enough, it works with both "should" and "shouldn't," although the meaning is different. (She ate everything in the house and then complained that he should have gone shopping because they were

It's still too much for one sentence, but at least it makes more sense now. How about this: "Don't tell me I shouldn't have gone grocery shopping. You're the one who ate everything I bought!" or "Don't tell me I

If "ram" is an animal, it needs to be "a ram" or "the ram." If "Ram" is someone's name, it needs to be capitalized. And why not just say "She is taller than a ram/the ram/Ram?"

You won't say "pieces of t-shirts" and you certainly would say "piece of t-shirts." Was that singular "piece" just a typo? Lord knows I make enough of those. Barb -- I think this is another typo!

It's fine grammatically, but "yummy" is not the best choice here. "Yummy" is sort of a childish word. The food was delicious/excellent would be better. Also -- veget a rian