Put a full stop/period at the end and it's fine. CB

Both are correct but they don't mean the same thing. The first sentence makes more sense since it indicates that the person in question ate excessively before he was taken ill. CB

No. Used to is possible only in the past tense. CB

I know where to go. (same sentence - no case conflict) I'm as comfortable saying that "where" is what I know and "to go" answers the question; as I am to say that "to go" is what I know and "where"

wow, thats incorrect. although both are adj, 'near' isnt used in front of nouns except rarely. It can be used as an adj, 'her house is near' but in front of a noun 'nearby' is almost always a better choice. I, too, would

I wouldn't hesitate to use who even in serious writing simply because it is so common. From a strictly grammatical point of view, whom will please those who insist on the object form when the pronoun is an object. It is the object of the

Neither sentence is correct. Not is in the wrong place. I should not have r u n is right. Should is a defective auxiliary and thus an infinitive must be used after it. There are two infinitives in the active voice and another two in the passive.

It may be. In most cases such a sentence isn't a question and thus a full stop would be placed at the end insteaqd of the question mark. Incidentally, you need not SHOUT. CB

why 'get up early in morning' is not acceptable? Why isn't 'get up in morning' acceptable? The only reason I can think of is that no one says so. Acceptability is largely determined simply by what people say or write. Also,

So there you go according to the bible GAYS will not enter the kingdom of God which is heaven What makes you think this is a problem for homosexual people? Are you sure they would like to go to Heaven? If they get harassed by straight people here