__ he is a very rich man doen't provide him a(n)__ before the judge. A)The fact/advantage B)That/advantage Does the word "fact" require "that" all the time? Is A wrong?

By the early 20th century the local ceramic industry of Kütahya ---- more or less to an end, but now the city -- the focus of a revival of this skilled art. A) had come / is B) would have come / was C) would have come / is D) was

I see. According to the Article in 1991 they would be banned in 1993 and 1996 but in retrospect they weren't. The sentences in my post mean it, right?

but the banning is not hypotetical, is it? It is their plan. 1. I would go on a picnic tomorrow. 2. I will go on a picnic tomorrow. What is the difference? Why would one use 1 if he/she were to do so?

Common fungicides -- for the puzzlingly high levels of DDT still found in some soils, even in regions where this potent insecticide -- decades ago. A) are blamed / would have been banned B) could be to blame / was banned C) might be blamed /

If we say "X is the element of fiction", it means, "Fiction has only one element, and that element is X". Do you agree with this?

Is there a way to understand whether a verb can be used transitively or intransitively. For example eat can be used both transitively and intransitively. - He hasn't eaten yet. - He ate a hamburger. Longman dictionary says the verb

Little is kn o w n of early Finnish histor y , but it ---- that the ancestors of the modern Finns ---- in Finl an d a b o ut 9,00 0 yea r s a go . . A) is thou g ht / arrived B) is thought / w e r e arri v ing C) is thought / w

Before I read Freud, I -- dreams were of so much significance. A) haven't thought B) wouldn't think C) didn't think D) don't think E) wouldn't have thought On a standard test, which one do you think would be wiser to