Is it ok saying like that: Material A has a bending strength of 100MPa and a fracture toughness of 1.0MPam1/2, the values of both of which would be considered inadequate for the fabrication of component B. Being bugged by which clauses Ajudame!

Curious abt no.1, would "had drowned" mean "drowned and then died"?

CalifJim wrote: A has a B over which is formed a C Integrated circuits are formed from a wafer or substrate over which are formed patterned microelectronics layers. Hmm. You changed has to are formed . Now it seems awkward with two uses of are

Anyone offering suggestions?

Infinik wrote: More specifically, "Integrated circuits are formed from a wafer or substrate over which are formed patterned microelectronics layers." Where A=IC, B=wafer, C=patterned

More specifically, "Integrated circuits are formed from a wafer or substrate over which are formed patterned microelectronics layers." Where A=IC, B=wafer, C=patterned layers

For three objects A, B & C where A consists of B and C is formed over B, is S1 below grammatically correct (and clear, if that's in doubt too)? S1: A has a B over which is formed a C. I'm wondering, shouldn't it be "A has a B over which

Hoa Thai wrote: Sandwiched between each pair of a layer of A and a layer of B is a layer of C. Thanx. This would be another good alternative in this thread.

Hoa Thai wrote: [ Proceeding from the top to the bottom, the structure consists of a layer of A, a layer of C, a layer of B, the core, a layer of B, a layer of C and a layer of A. ..... In another instance, between layers B and top and bottom

Clive wrote: (My Q is, shouldn't it be "are layers of C"?) Yes. Perhaps simply say "Between layers B and layers A are layers of C." Would this imply that there is a single layer of C on each side of the core? Or, since I want