I have never thought that the vernacular is to refer to a dialect, but rather to a language. I have first encountered with it while reading the history of the English language. The writer said that English contuines to be use alongside the

Is really there any difference? Thanks in advance

Grammar Geek wrote: I agree, Tidus, but she asked how to use it when she wanted to say she had accomplished something, not beaten an opponent. Hi GG, How do you know that it is "she" who asked the question? or is it familiar in

Anonymous wrote: Muslims are the biggest threat to civilization. I daresay that such a thinking is the biggest threat to civilization!!

Cool Breeze.... That's what I think would happen as well.

Hi all, To Anon, I know what you mean and actually I anticipate to see such a reply because every one of us has had his/her own beliefs in something and most of the time doesn't tolerate an opponent point of view. I have never gone into details

Hi again, I believe in the necessity of a turnabout as well. And may be you'd be astonished if I tell that this turnabout in our Muslim nation would be brought about by committing back to the true Islam. I can tell as a Muslim living through

Allow Pidr1nhu to answer your questions concerning Islam. I am going to put my answer in points to make it much clearer: 1. Your talk about the globalization and its deadly results is true, nevertheless this doesn't give the right to interfere

Hi there, To me and many Musilms as well, we don't hate people of the Western World . What I really hates is the way the governments of the Western World deal with us imposing themselves as patrons. Who give this laibilty? I don't know, our

Nevil.Ni wrote: but at least, I know that hamas always be defined as a terrorism. Alas, most people all over the world take this for granted. This is what Isreal and thier allies want people to believe thus they are deceived to