I wonder if I want to use "should" in the same scenario but in the context of "should of advice",  do I say "I shouldn't have thought so" as in "I have already thought that he is going to go into coma, but

I wonder if the "in" is optional as in the following case If you have problems in finding the hotel, please let me know. If you have problems finding the hotel, please let me know. thanks

I see a panel of five icons on the monitor, displayed vertically one from another. How do I describe them one by one? I am thinking of saying  "the top(most) one is ... , the second from the top is ..., the one in the middle is .., the fourth

"why does my child act aggressive at school?" "why does my kid act aggressive toward his brother?" Shouldn't we say "act aggressively" ? Or is it just some kind of shorthand expression from an upset parent?

Guess I am surrounded by doctors with poor knowledge of English grammar ? They say it all the times that "you have A cancer in your prostate" or "you have A cancer in your stomach", although they also say  "it's

While both "cancer" and "heart disease" seems countable, as we hear it all the times that "you have a cancer" or "you have a heart disease"; why do we say "you are at risk of cancer" "you are

maybe just being anal - but do we say "you are at risk of heart disease" or do we say "you are at risk of A heart disease" ?

I've been told, as far back as I can remember, to always use "the government" (with the exception when I compare different governments where I may be able to use "a government") in my sentence. But in a book written by a

My suggestion that "to bind" is a great example ? hardly so. The closest I found in my post says "I can't think of a "better" example where ..." , there I was referring a "better one" than the one in

Thanks for the elaborated explanation. It clarifies some of my confusion. I wonder in the usage of "to bind" (other examples welcome), do these two usages (transitive vs. intransitive) convey different meanings? Personally I can't