"He observes that that which each person regards as good is that which appears so to himself, and that which appears good to each person is not so by nature". It seems to me that I should add another "that" after ", and". Is this right?

1) "One may say that the Pyrrhonist is inclined to believe that there are other human beings, but evidently this is not the same as actually believing it ." 2) "It is perfectly possible for a humanitarian Pyrrhonist to abandon his philanthropic

"If someone were to say that nothing is by nature more to be chosen than to be avoided, nor more to be avoided than to be chosen, he will live happily". (This text is a translation from the Greek; this is why it may sound weird.) Is this usage

May I say: "It is not possible to solve this difficulty by arguing...", or must I use "resolve"? Thanks.

Thanks P. The problem is that dogmatikos is singular, so it sounds weird to me to say " those who". I think I'll stick to "he". Even if I hate feminists, I don't think this usage may be taken as evidence.

Perhaps the best solution is to say "he or she", so no one will find it offensive (mostly feminists).

by doctrines? Yes, in its technical usage. Cheers, Sextus

"I employ the term 'dogmatist' in the sense in which S. uses dogmatikos , namely, to designate someone who makes positive or negative assertions about the nature of things, on the basis of what they/he/the person consider/considers to be evidence

. Sextus

Well, that's an interesting analysis.