Right, "Edward" is not the antecedent of "that". Keep in mind that the word "that" is not used as a demonstrative pronoun in the sentence. It is used as a relative pronoun.

Hi Cute I'm not a man. You can call me Amy. If I had to choose between the words, I guess I'd choose "likely" -- not because it's "better", but only because it is probably a little more commonly used. Other than

Yes, something like that, Newguest. The paragraph itself tells you what it means. It refers to a lack or cessation of holding and carrying a baby, and thus also the deprivation of physical contact.

Hi Cute572 The word "that" is a relative pronoun in your sentence. It refers back to "report" and it introduces a defining relative clause . The word "he" is the subject of the clause.

Hi Cute572 You should use "affect", which means "have an influence on". The word "effect" is usually used as a noun, and it doesn't work as a verb in your sentence. You could use either "likely" or

It took me the time it took for the halftime break to finish to eat my dinner. I ate my dinner in the time it took for the halftime break to start and finish. I'd say those sentences are much too convoluted. Try this: It took me the whole

I agree with Avangi, though. The word in sounds the most natural (and most typical) to me in Pleasehelp's particular sentence.

You've posted in a thread that is nearly a year old, Sitifan. Should we understand your post as a new question or simply as a belated statement?

Hi Anon I have merged your two threads since they in essence asked the same question.

Hi Dipsik Either one is OK. If you place "only" directly in front of "an infinitesimal chance", then you would be focusing the idea of "only" directly on "an infinitesimal chance".