I see it fairly often in written texts, and it feels quite normal to me to use it in my writing as well.

And who says all British magazines speak English correctly? My way of thinking about this one would be that we use the nominative case ('I', 'he', etc.) when the subordinate clause refers to its subject (sorry, I don't know how to say this in

Haha, no, to my knowledge there is no such dance, so you're welcome to invent one! At any rate, 'Tango' the drink may have been named that as a play on the word 'tangerine' (=orange-like fruits).

First of all, it should be 'whom do you live with', or 'with whom do you live'. I'd say the first one is by far the most frequently used of the two.

I'm not a native speaker, so I may well be wrong about this, but I would pick number 3. When I hear 'what' in such a structure, I always think of a singular 'something', regardless of how many things that 'what' might be referring to later in

Thank you. Some people do think I am quite an able dance student, but with only about a year's dancing experience, I still have a long way ahead!

I think the names foreign learners of English give to the tenses are perhaps a bit different than those native learners are taught in schools. At any rate, 'I have been...' is the tense I know as 'present perfect'. It denotes something that

Tango the drink is an invention counting only a year or two of life, while tango the dance is an invention of the early 20th century - so it's quite clear where the saying 'it takes two to tango' comes from! And as for a little background

I think the correct form is 'they/them' whenever you want to say 'him' or 'her' but have no way of knowing the gender of the person in advance, even when it is only one person you're referring to.

Also, I think it should be 'at the ATIA 2004 Conference'.