do you mean a direct and an inderect object in the same sentence? certainly ... i gave her the flowers. (her = i.o., flowers = d.o.) but, if you substitute flowers for a pronoun, the sentence changes: i gave them to her. i do not believe

ok... more info on "stative verbs ... - Verbs of inert perception and cognition, e.g. think, believe, like, love, see, feel, forgive, hear, remember, smell and wish... occasionally, people use these verbs in a future sense ... example: i

yes, people do say this sort of thing, to emphasize the immediacy of the action. "i am loving it" means you are presently in the act of enjoying something (e.g. food at mcdonald's). another example ... you may ask a person, "how is the new job?"

i have a feeling a silver coupe will be under me and my wife's christmas tree ... OR i have a feeling my wife and i will find a silver coupe under our christmas tree

the "me" is because "me" is how i refer to myself (see julie andrews - sound of music -"me, a name, i call myself" - even though here it should be written "mi") therefore the phrase "me and my wife" is sort of a collective name, so "me and my

"for" him, maybe "about" him, or "in love with" him ... all would be ok

there is that aspect also of rather ... again, though, it means "instead of"

not capped ... as discussed earlier, directions are capped when referring to fairly specific regions. i used to live in the South (meaning in a southern state of the US)

(exception to be made for foriegn languages ... always capped!) i study French ... i am taking French 101

we, is first person PLURAL ... as opposed to i, which is first person SINGULAR as for the original sentence, to include oneself you might say we, the officers, were dispatched ... or maybe officers, myself included, were dispatched ...