http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/15/2204.pdf approximately 600k

But I don't know what analysis they are referring to. Here's the whole paragraph: Moreover, it may be difficult to separate the effects of salt from other nutrients that may contribute to stomach cancer risk. The absence of adjustment

In Tables 1 and 2, few studies have controlled for dietary factors in their analyses of salt consumption, which makes it difficult to compare the different studies according to the dietary variables adjusted in the analysis . However, the

symptoms of diabete and metabolic syndrome (symptoms present in both diseases) = inclusive AND symptoms of diabete and metabolic syndrome (symptoms of either disease A or disease B) = exclusive AND

Ok, it is different, then truly the sentence is ambiguous because I had several interpretations until now.

Improved for readability May reduce onset risk or symptoms of metabolic syndrome and diabetes. Reduce the onset risk of any of the two diseases and reduce the symptoms present in both diseases? and is used both as an "exclusive and"

There is an inclusive AND and an exclusive AND How do you know whether it is an inclusive AND or an exclusive AND if they are expressed by the same word? I posted this earlier: May reduce onset risk or symptoms of metabolic syndrome

May reduce onset risk or symptoms of metabolic syndrome and diabetes Does it mean "May reduce the risk of having both a metabolic syndrome and any type of diabetes and reduce the risk of having an undefined number of symptoms seen both in a

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is a type of lipoprotein that transports cholesterol and triglycerides from the liver to peripheral tissues. LDL is one of the five major groups of lipoproteins; these groups include chylomicrons, very low-density

What does "evolve into each other" means? An ancient Earth was a necessary part of Darwin's vision of evolution, which required vast stretches of time for species to evolve into each other. Doesn't sound right. I would