<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.englishforums.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'user:Mythical?Lady'</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/search/pro.htm?q=user%3aMythical%3fLady&amp;o=DateDescending</link><description>Search results for 'user:Mythical?Lady'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>XMOD (Build: 3616.28671)</generator><item><title>A terrible phonological Anylsis (Latin alternations)..</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ATerriblePhonologicalAnylsisLatin-Alternations/jxbww/post.htm</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:21:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:820904</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>hi there,   I&amp;#39;ve been on this phonological problem for about 3 days. All I got are a big question mark and a terrible headache... PLZ help:   I have three sets of data from Latin and i m asked to give underlying forms and write rules to account for alternations.   Nominative       Gentive 1. murmur        murmuris    fu:r            fu:ris   far            farris    os             ossis It seems to me that the genitive maker is -is and there&amp;#39;s no nominative maker, and latin doent allow consonant clusters in the coda, so there is a deletion rule assuming that /farr/ and /oss/ are the underlying representations   2. o:s   o:rs   flo:s   flo:ris   mu:s   mu:ris There&amp;#</description></item><item><title>Re:  Plz check the grammaticality of the sentence!</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PlzCheckGrammaticalitySentence/wlpkh/post.htm#727103</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:21:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:727103</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Hi Mistar Micawber,    I&amp;#39;ve a sort of syntactic analysis I&amp;#39;ve to do; I don&amp;#39;t know if I can go for it here or in the linguistics part.   In brief, I want to argue fo sentences like  Mary believes Jack to be flawless to decide between subject to object raising and s-erasure as a transformational rule based on passive and reflexive pronouns.    So I was thinking, if believe can take infinitival complement in which there&amp;#39;s a pronoun referring back to the subject. (Syntactically both the subject of the matrix sentence (the main clause) and the object pronoun of the infinitival clause (the embedded clause) are coreferential).    From &amp;quot;Mary believes that Jack is flawless&amp;quot;, STOR produces &amp;quot;Mary believes Jack to be...</description></item><item><title>Re:  The Grapes of Wrath</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TheGrapesOfWrath/5/clvwd/Post.htm#726751</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 13:12:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:726751</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Hi,    It feels wonderful to see your topics updated with valuable posts even after a long time. Thanks Adrenochrome!    And literature is the joy of life if this can be said.I&amp;#39;ve read War and Peace! Why to avoid it? It&amp;#39;s been a long time not to read novels. My interest has been shifted recently to nonfictional writings. &amp;quot;Arabian Sands&amp;quot; by Wilfred Thesiger is the last masterpiece I ve read. I&amp;#39;d love to see your recommendations of whatever valulable that can be read.  As I spend most of my time on linguistics today, periodical shifts to literature from time to time would recreational!   Thanks again!   Life is too short, use your time :)</description></item><item><title>Plz check the grammaticality of the sentence!</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PlzCheckGrammaticalitySentence/wlpkh/post.htm</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 12:40:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:726723</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Mary believes John to betray her.   where &amp;quot;her&amp;quot; refers to Mary. If not, why and what possible verbs can occur in the infinitival complement after (believe+object) provided that I can keep an object pronoun referring back to the subject?   Thanx in advance :)</description></item><item><title>Re: Post</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ProbableAndOtherVerbals/wwhgx/post.htm#710072</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 19:03:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:710072</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>^ 
 ^ 
 ^ 
 ^ 
 can anyone answer my final question plz asap??? 
  
 Thanks 
  
 My regards,</description></item><item><title>Post</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ProbableAndOtherVerbals/wwhgx/post.htm#709764</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 13:32:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:709764</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>So for probable, does it sound correct to say &amp;quot;Sami is probable to pass the exam&amp;quot; from &amp;quot;it&amp;#39;s probable that Sami will pass the exam?&amp;quot; I know likely fits perfectly here, but i question the usage of probable in particular. Based on this, much can be said in my syntactic anylasis.</description></item><item><title>Post</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ProbableAndOtherVerbals/wwhgx/post.htm#709704</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 12:09:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:709704</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>What a relief! 
 
  
 You know Avangi I based my analysis on your answer. Those made-up sentences were just to check my understanding. 
  
 For &amp;quot;probable&amp;quot;, we come to define verbals as adjective in nature behaving like verb or let&amp;#39;s say occupying verbal positions according to &amp;quot;Syntactic Argumentation and the Structure of English&amp;quot; by Perlmutter and Soames. It is somehow an outdated book. Yet we come to study it as a basis in syntax particularly for those lacking a sound background in syntax. To tell the truth I didn&amp;#39;t like :)  
  
 Thank you very much</description></item><item><title>Probable and other verbals</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ProbableAndOtherVerbals/wwhgx/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 10:44:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:709611</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Hi all,     I want to check the correct use of the underlned verbals in the following sentences:  (probable+infinitive) From &amp;quot;It&amp;#39;s probable that the disease is epidemic&amp;quot;, can I say &amp;quot;The disease is probable to be epidemic&amp;quot;?  The cat is probable to be out of the bag (does it convey the idiomatic meaning?)   It&amp;#39;s probable to be rainy today.     (bound + that) It&amp;#39;s bound that Mary applies for the job.     (there+seem) There seems to be a hoopoe in the garden.     (certain+infinitive) It&amp;#39;s certain to snow today                The *** is certain to hit the fan.     Are these uses grammatical?  You may understand that I am doing some syntactic stuff here :)     I highly appreciate your help.   Thanks in advance.</description></item><item><title>Re: Websites on Linguistics</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WebsitesOnLinguistics/hbnzz/post.htm#595292</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:52:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:595292</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Hi again, Thank you very much And yes Tanit I do have an access at the university, but coz it&amp;#39;s very long way to get there whenever I want, most of my work is done at home. For the refereed journals, yep that&amp;#39;s what I meant. I missed the term. Thanks for telling me  Regards,</description></item><item><title>Websites on Linguistics</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WebsitesOnLinguistics/hbnzz/post.htm</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:13:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:593407</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Hi there, Can you provide me with websites publishing approved journals on linguistics parlicularly applied linguistics and EFL? Most websites I come to know demand accounts which I have to pay for. My problem is that I don&amp;#39;t know if they are trusted websites publishing approved journals.  I&amp;#39;d highly appreciate it. Thanks in advance   Regards,</description></item><item><title>Re: I am new!</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IAmNew/hbcln/post.htm#590696</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:50:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:590696</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Hi Loveto Travel, Welcome to the EF. I ve never thought of companies designed particularly for pronunciation!! So what&amp;#39;s the objective of the company? is it to improve American pronunciation in some way or to help others to master American pronunciation? how could you achieve it? do you have a website for online contact or anyhting? Sorry for bothering you with so many questions. I am just interested.  Welcome again, Regards,</description></item><item><title>Re: do it vs do it all around</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/DoItVsDoItAllAround/hbclw/post.htm#590683</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:03:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:590683</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Yes. As I am examining more and more examples of different native American languages, I found it very strange how these languages are working and how their speakers could communicate with each other (if they ever had to!)  Thank you Clive so much</description></item><item><title>User profile picture</title><link /><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:59:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:590410</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Uploaded on Friday, November 21, 2008</description></item><item><title>Re: do it vs do it all around</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/DoItVsDoItAllAround/hbclw/post.htm#590380</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:43:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:590380</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Hi again, Actually, they are said in isolation like those previously mentioned. The purpose of the exercise is to consider sentences from Ineseno Chumash, a language spoken north of Santa Barbare, California: Salimexkeken ( he stretches it out ) Nokalkalimexkeken ( I will stretch it out all over ) Seqwel ( He does it ) Keqkeqwel ( I do it all around ) As noticed, the reduplication in Ineseno is meant to convey a certain semantic meaning. I should deduce the meaning from the English version of these sentences. Hope you get it! Thanks</description></item><item><title>do it vs do it all around</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/DoItVsDoItAllAround/hbclw/post.htm</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:01:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:590333</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Hi there, I want your help with this: What is the semantic difference between &amp;quot; do it&amp;quot; and &amp;quot; do it all around &amp;quot;? It is said that it has the same semantic difference as &amp;quot; stretch it out&amp;quot; &amp;amp; &amp;quot;stretch it out all over&amp;quot;. Is it opposition or the sense of covering all respects? (this is my attempt  ) Thanks in advance Regards,</description></item><item><title>Re: Every man loves a woman</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EveryManLovesAWoman/2/zxqvc/Post.htm#492507</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:50:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:492507</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Hi there, 
 Thank you all very much 
 Indeed, context is everything. But the problem here is that we are not given any context. The purporse of the exercise is to remove the ambiguity of every sentence by virtue of its semantic interpretions out of the context.</description></item><item><title>Re: Every man loves a woman</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EveryManLovesAWoman/zxqvc/post.htm#492170</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:42:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:492170</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>The first sentence is 
 Every man loves a woman. 
 Does it have the following interpretions: 
 Every man loves only one woman. ( who is one definite entity) This interpretion sounds weird to me. 
 Any man loves any woman. ( i.e their love is not confined to one woman ) 
 To Forbes: 
 As a matter of fact, the sentence seems ambiguous in my mother tongue which is Arabic. But when I tried to analyse it, I virtually tried to exculde my mother tongue and only think in English. 
 BTW, I didn&amp;#39;t notice that it&amp;#39;s ambiguous in my mother tongue till you brought it up.</description></item><item><title>Re: Children of war</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ChildrenOfWar/zxrnl/post.htm#491107</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:33:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:491107</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Hi there, 
 Dominik you are absolutely right. Alas,the more we see such pictures, the sadder and more passive we become. We are accustomed to veiwing these events, yet we do nothing. What do you think is the reason? 
 Is it indifference about others or because we can do nothing??</description></item><item><title>Re: Every man loves a woman</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EveryManLovesAWoman/zxqvc/post.htm#491104</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:22:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:491104</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Yes I got it. It is about the function of the article &amp;quot; a &amp;quot; either specific or non-specfic. 
 What about the 1st sentence? 
 Thank you very much</description></item><item><title>Every man loves a woman</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EveryManLovesAWoman/zxqvc/post.htm</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:43:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:491081</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>This sentence along with: 
 Bill wants to marry a Norwegian woman. 
 are said to have smenatically more than one interpretion. After a long time of pondering, I came to no avail.. (except my eyes hurt!! ) 
 Could any one provide me with some clues? 
  
 Thanks in advance, 
 Regards,</description></item><item><title>Re: Expand your vocabulary and feed the world!</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ExpandVocabularyFeedWorld/4/zhbpl/Post.htm#478490</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:43:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:478490</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Nice site ... 
 Thanks Annvan, 
 My best level was 30. I&amp;#39;ll try harder tomorrow. Good way to have fun, donate, and increase your knowledge!</description></item><item><title>Re: Have a good Ramadan..</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HaveAGoodRamadan/3/zrrwm/Post.htm#421793</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:48:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:421793</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Hi all, 
 Happy Ramadan for you all. I am having a very pleasent time during this month and hope all of you have the same. 
 "Let this Ramadan be an opportunity for us to look at our conditions and make some positive changes, to remedy our shortcomings, and start on a better footing, to seek brighter future and become better in what we do and what we say"... 
 Happpppppy Ramadan</description></item><item><title>Re: Must-Read BOOKS!!</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/MustReadBooks/3/vjwgr/Post.htm#416913</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:32:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:416913</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Insider wrote:    
 I think all books are must-read books. 
     
 I don't believe so. There are many books that you even regret buying them. One said that "Some written items aren't published, some published books aren't bought, some bought books aren't read, some read books aren't understood, and some understood books are misunderstood!!"</description></item><item><title>Re: Must-Read BOOKS!!</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/MustReadBooks/3/vjwgr/Post.htm#416911</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:25:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:416911</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Lessons for life that can't be remembered!! 
 What a book!</description></item><item><title>Re: Who's to decide the future?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhosToDecideTheFuture/vnjcn/post.htm#400824</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 02:56:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:400824</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Kooyeen wrote:        Milky wrote:    
 

 
 
 
 "We are a majority,"   
     No, the majority are the Chinese. Chinese is the most spoken language, so Chinese should be the official way to speak. So we all should start studying Chinese now, and forget about our language and all the others, because they are not official.      
 I think he refers to the majority of non-native speakers of English. And Yes I believe that nonnatives of English are the majority. If not, they are increasing day by day. (more than non-native speakers of Chinese) 
 While studying the history of the English Language, I have come through the following statements 
 "if the future of a language were merely a matter of the number who use it as a first...</description></item><item><title>Re: email</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Email/5/vkxdk/Post.htm#400145</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 00:56:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:400145</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Hi there, 
 I received a similar emial two days ago. 
 -------------------------------------------------------- 
 This email was sent from a user at englishforums.com. Replying to this email will be sent back to the user via normal email. Sent From: Sweetbabe Subject: Hello dear, __________________________________ Hello dear, My name isGlory Mako. My hobbies are reading, music, watching of movies and playing of basketball. I was impressed when i saw your profile and will like to discuss important matter with you and as well as establishe a long lasting relationship with you. In addition, please kindly contact me direct with my e-mail address:  glory_130@yahoo.co.uk  Waiting to hear from you soonest. With love. Miss Glory. 
...</description></item><item><title>Re: Is it easy to be a muslim?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IsItEasyToBeAMuslim/8/vznqm/Post.htm#394988</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 01:42:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:394988</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Hi there, 
 I am a little bit surprised when hearing someone is feeling insult because of the veil. I might at first find it acceptable. But when I repeat and repeat all over again that it's not directed to insult or hurt your feeling, I am to be astonished. It's a commitment to what I believe in. So how could it hurt you when I am the one who is meant to? Believe me Dew, the veil is not a threat to other countries, it's not to bother you, or disturb your security. So no need to have all these worries and talks about it. All is wanted is to accept me as I am as well as I accept you as you are ( on one condition no offence is intended ) When you have your safety threatened ( which I doubt in the case of the veil) you completely have the...</description></item><item><title>Re: Is it easy to be a muslim?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IsItEasyToBeAMuslim/7/vznqm/Post.htm#394545</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 02:50:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:394545</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>One question I'd like to ask: 
 Who do you think is arousing all these questions ( about trivial things as you said) ? Is it Muslims? Is it Muslims who prohibit wearing veils in schools as in France or planning to do so in public places as in UK? Is it Muslims who frequently claim a break of human rights merely because of not joining women in politics? and many trivial issues? I daresay that many trivial people arouse these trivial questions for indulging trivial Muslims in trivial defense and that's really what is happening, driving them away from many real problems. Many of these questions are concerned with tradition of the social life and not Islam.  
 Do we doubt the originality of our religion or the wisedom of its rules? to...</description></item><item><title>Re: Biography</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/Biography/vlmhn/post.htm#392866</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:27:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:392866</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Hi, 
 Nice to meet a biography-lover, 'cause I'm one of them 
 I recall some of the biography I read 
 Nilson Mandela, a great one. 
 The Wild Swans (Three daughters of China) a horrioble one. 
 Malcolm X ( as told to Alex Haley) an surprising and inspiring one. 
 A Million Little Pieces ( it's told to be a memoir but it turns that the writer fabrciated some events) to me it's very vivid and proves to be hard to put down. 
 My Life ( Bill Clinton) a little bit boring. 
 The Way to Makkah ( Mohammad Assad) a wonderful one. 
 That's all I recall by now. I am planning to read ( The Arabian Sands by Wilfred Thesiger) which is an account of the writer's travel through the deserts of the Arabian Peninsula after I finish reading...</description></item><item><title>Re: How to being a great nation?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/HowToBeingAGreatNation/5/vkkmz/Post.htm#390593</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 01:23:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:390593</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Nice Pictures. Hope to make it there soon!</description></item><item><title>Re: Islam:veiling women!</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IslamVeilingWomen/19/czpcc/Post.htm#390099</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 01:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:390099</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Dear Kabayan, 
 I've already settled the matter with Dew. I believe the way you do. He's really a considerate man and I fully respect him and you as well. I just want to make some points considering me and Muslim women seeking for much understanding from others. 
 I am going to repeat a plea I've already stated when first posting this topic: whenever you deal with a veiled women, don't concentrate on the veil and deal with the human and brain behind it. 
 Long Live Peace and Friendship!</description></item><item><title>Re: Islam:veiling women!</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IslamVeilingWomen/19/czpcc/Post.htm#389871</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:06:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:389871</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>It's funny when you hear somebody spoke of the others (who in reality are meant to speak) and talked about their feelings while they are not what they say. Being a Muslim woman who is proud to wear the veil, I feel no humilation, neither I feel male dominance over me, neither I follow rules with blind faith. 
 A few days age, a poll presented on a T.V show to ask women in my country ( Saudi Arabia) whether they like to wear the veil or not. Surprisingly to others, expected by me, 97% of the voters prefer to wear the veil. I believe they feel the way I do. No humiliation, No male dominance because of the veil, No following the rules with blind faith. 
 Then what? do you still feel sympathy and pity over veiled women? then I should tell...</description></item><item><title>Re: Islam, is the Religion of Peace</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IslamIsTheReligionOfPeace/18/vdbvd/Post.htm#385445</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 17:48:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:385445</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Hi Dew, 
 I am glad we reach a state of compromise which relieves me. The Holy Qura'n is indeed the book that I trust, along with any book proves to be wise and helpful. Holding a certain veiw which's completely against other's veiw (provided no harm or understimating of the other's belief and personality) doesn't prevent respect and peace among nations. 
 So I am pleased to take the glass from you!</description></item><item><title>Re: Islam, is the Religion of Peace</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IslamIsTheReligionOfPeace/18/vdbvd/Post.htm#385438</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:56:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:385438</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Hi Dew, 
 First of all, I'd like to thank for showing how tolerant and respectable you are to me. Addressing me as this Lady or the Lady shows something of your manner of behaviour! 
 Secondly, I don't know that I have been in any way aggressive in my replays or how on earth you got the idea that I'm trying to convert you. When stating what I believe is what I believe doesn't mean that I am trying to affect you.Why do I care? 
 I reread my replays to you and say "How could he ever think this way?" Is it because I clarify the situation in Gaza Strip (which, being a Muslim, an Arab and a neighbour to Palestine, I am completely aware of) or because my clarification of the some aspects of the Qur'an? Still I don't know why you are...</description></item><item><title>Re: The United States has increasingly stepped up its role as world police.</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/TheUnitedStatesIncreasinglyStepped-RoleWorldPolice/2/vhrqw/Post.htm#384527</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:57:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:384527</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>YoungCalifornian wrote:    
 Too often the U.S. is made the scapegoat for the rest of the world's problems. 
     
 Sorry... but this is the funniest thing I;ve ever read!!</description></item><item><title>Re: Islam, is the Religion of Peace</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IslamIsTheReligionOfPeace/17/vdbvd/Post.htm#384517</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:37:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:384517</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Hi Dew, 
 This source of information that as Muslims we believe in is not a mere book of facts and information. Definitely our World is so great and so endless that a single book could fully describe. The Qur'an is to give us basics that we should (as believers) abide to them and measure things upon. It calls for minds to work, to learn, to reflect, to have a functioning part in our society and in the whole world. It elevates scientists and literate people and gives them higher ranks. So that any thing useful, progressive and helpful in the world (either a believer or non-believer does) is to be encouraged and acquired.</description></item><item><title>Re: A Million Little Pieces (do you really care if it'snot true?)</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AMillionLittlePiecesReallyCare-ItsnotTrue/vkcvm/post.htm#384183</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:19:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:384183</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>I sometimes pay a huge price for things considered not authentic. I mean we all mostly do . We run after novels, stories, movies, such material which are all imaginary, yet we love them and enjoy them. 
 I really enjoy reading the book.I don't feel upset because I found out what he did and I don't regret reading it because it adds somehting new to me. It draws my attention to the type of the experience and belief , my sympathy over a certain type of people I have never thought about them seriously. I think that the book partially serves its purpose. Yes, he loses his credibility that I even quit the idea of buying his next book "My Friend Leonard", but the attention and ideas that book revive are not to be denied.</description></item><item><title>Re: Your opinion about the Russians</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/YourOpinionAboutRussians/3/vjwxv/Post.htm#384169</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:50:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:384169</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>My opinion is divided into two images: 
 One of the government which seems to me to be a little bit scary and frightful. I amn't that good follower of the Russian events. May be out of three or more events that I follow, the result was dreadful, mostly blood and death. Maybe it's one event that renders that feeling but it sticks in my mind. 
 That of the Russian people, I can't deny the effect of Tolstoy's and Pasternak's writings on me which I believe is old-dated . 
 I know my information about Russia is poor but I hope one day I can go there and see myself. Also I'll make sure to watch the film recommended by Dew to have a better and truthful image.</description></item><item><title>A Million Little Pieces (do you really care if it'snot true?)</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AMillionLittlePiecesReallyCare-ItsnotTrue/vkcvm/post.htm</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:02:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:383872</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>I finished reading this memoir in three days. I amn't exaggerating when saying that I couldn't accept the idea of being asleep while the book isn't finished reading. . 
 Anyhow, after a while , I discovered that the writer ,James Frey, was writing some fabricated events (while the book is held as a memoir) , in his terms , he just added some embellishments and other alternations. This causes a big controversy. Some said that he was lying to the readers (who believe every word written and are greatly affected). Thus he loses his credibility and is believed to be manipulating with readers' feelings. 
 My question is that do you really care if it's not true? will you feel betrayed? Or is it enough for you that you enjoy reading it?</description></item><item><title>Re: Islam, is the Religion of Peace</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IslamIsTheReligionOfPeace/16/vdbvd/Post.htm#383859</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:27:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:383859</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Hi there, 
 Dew: No one can deny that some people, alas, misusing their own religion to defend thier own cause and interset. But the great division that should be drawn is between the religion (the message being conveyed ) and the people ( believing and practising what they just like) . And in fact, this's what causes the fight. 
 Another thing is that the situation in Gaza Strip (between Fatah and Hamas) is not a struggle caused by a split in the same religion. Each party is ultimately political party. The conflict is casued because each is objecting the ways the other usesto handle things. Most followers of Fatah or Hamas are Muslims and there are some Christains as well. I believe that there are outsiders who are agitating the...</description></item><item><title>Re: Is Russian salad a sweet dish and should it also be served...</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IsRussianSaladSweetDishAlsoServed/vgnqj/post.htm#370376</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 14:45:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:370376</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Russian Salad is always served in my county and we usually eat it before the main course. As far as I know it's not a sweet dish!! But yeah we eat something sweet after a heavy meal (that adds insult to injury I believe )</description></item><item><title>Re: Islam:veiling women!</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IslamVeilingWomen/8/czpcc/Post.htm#362135</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 17:04:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:362135</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Jhumjhum wrote:    [....wearing a modest dress( I mean to cover the body and legs )is totally diiferent from wearing overalls covering the face as a rule ,even if you are the ugliset one,and even if you live in a hot and humid tropical country, is ridiculous to me.I think this is a misinterpretation of the religion by some orthodox people.     
 Hi Jhumjhum , 
 I was really distressed when reading your post . You think that what we do (wear the hijab) is RIDICULOUS!! Following a certain rule we BELIEVE in is not something silly to me even I live in the hottest place ever in he world. And certainly when I find someone acts according to his/her principles, to what he/she believe in. I would respect this person, merely because he/she is a...</description></item><item><title>Re: Englishforums in 2150 AD</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/EnglishforumsIn2150Ad/2/vzgvd/Post.htm#361421</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 10:03:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:361421</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>The generations living in 2150 will think of us as we are exactly thinking of Shakespeare and his time.</description></item><item><title>Re: strange way to increase morale</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/StrangeIncreaseMorale/vvpdz/post.htm#359018</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 11:37:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:359018</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Grammar Geek wrote:    
 I have to read it as the "which" clause attaching to "bonuses," not the "not giving bonuses." 
     
 Hi GG, 
 If "which" clause is read as it's attached to bonuses, wouldn't the writer uses the verb "are" after "which" to clear the ambiguity?</description></item><item><title>Re: Are women manipulative?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/AreWomenManipulative/3/cclrv/Post.htm#358771</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 19:50:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:358771</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Both are manipulative each in his/her own way. But honestly, women are more maniplative.</description></item><item><title>Re: Which language is most difficult language for people to learn?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhichLanguageMostDifficultLanguage-Learn/2/vvgcd/Post.htm#358766</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 19:44:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:358766</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Hi, 
 Does belonging to a certain family (of languages) determine one's ability to study a foreign language of the same famliy of his/her mother tongue? 
 I mean though Arabic and Persian belong to different families , being one of our neighbours,I've met many Iranians who perfectly master Arabic but even the Jewishs could master Arabic, their command isn't as good as Iranians'. 
 And Pucca it's Arabic. Really there's no offense, I do feel the same to the languages I don't understand.</description></item><item><title>Re: Chomsky's Life</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/ChomskysLife/vvnwj/post.htm#358760</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 19:27:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:358760</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Doll wrote:    He is still living but students in my faculty will kill him one day.     

 Doll, most of my colleagues do feel the same</description></item><item><title>Re: Preposition-dependent verbs</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/PrepositionDependentVerbs/2/vvvnh/Post.htm#358752</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 19:08:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:358752</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Thanks CJ, though it's a long thread, I enjoy reading it.</description></item><item><title>Re: Islam, is the Religion of Peace</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/IslamIsTheReligionOfPeace/7/vdbvd/Post.htm#358181</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:00:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:358181</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Definitely Pucca. 
 And Doll, you are right.</description></item><item><title>Re: Which language is most difficult language for people to learn?</title><link>http://www.englishforums.com/English/WhichLanguageMostDifficultLanguage-Learn/2/vvgcd/Post.htm#358179</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:58:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">946f00bb-57d3-4b7b-a9a2-059b5341af52:358179</guid><dc:creator>mythical lady</dc:creator><description>Useful site, thank you. 
 I'd add that Persians could master Arabic as well.</description></item></channel></rss>