Mr. Lotus, You have made no statements nor arguments on the issue of good vs. evil. You only state that everyone knows what these are and imply that what's legal is what's good. See quote below: "If you can't tell the difference then why

"Actually I said 'right from wrong' but never mind." You also said "evil doer", what's your point here anyway? Good, evil, right, wrong. Want to argue about vocabulary? "If you can't tell the difference then why aren't you in jail. I just do

Regarding good vs. evil, anyone who invokes such concepts has a lot of explaining to do. What is evil? What is good? If I kick a beggar in the head and the shock causes him to rethink his life, quit drinking wine all day, and work hard to get a

"what is a colourful painting for one is just a blank sheet of paper for the other" Nice analogy! I hereby request permission to use it once in a while. These kinds of English oddities are exactly what make for misunderstandings, things

That you Henry and Miriam! Would it ever be proper to use whom to refer to the friends? "One of my friends, whom are cute, is here." I as this because the sentence "One of my friends, all of whom are cute, is here." sounds correct to me.

If anyone can answer these from an ultra-correct grammar point of view, I'd be very grateful. 1. In the sentence: "Help me ? the street," which is correct "cross" or "across"? Both? 2. In the sentence "One of my friends who ? cute is

Glad to help if/when I can. Jacobs give the rule, then says that in some cases it can and is broken. But, there is no concrete rule for breaking the rule. He justifies this with his opinion that we all know what a slept in bed is, but few

His key point is the last sentence, "We don't normally visualise a 'died-in' bed." This sentence in not a rule, it's just an indication of what we can get away with when we're breaking the previous rule. Really, it's just a fancy way of saying

You shouldn't use 'realest'. It's not a word. A good dictionary will list the inflected forms (-er, -ing, etc.) of a word. If none are listed, then use 'most', 'least', etc. E.g.: Meriam Webster, which is free at www.m-w.com, lists

Then this is what I would write: The title of the thread is "Grammer Nazi's enter if you DARE!" which is exactly what you've got above minus the full stop, the redundancy of which miriam pointed out in the first reply.