Ottoman Empire Was a great empire in 1300 to 1900.All europe combined their forces to stop Turks.I mean in that centuries Ottoman Empire was a mutual enemy for europeans. In WW1 Ottoman Empire started to fight in 6 front.One of them was Syria Frontline, and my grandfather has lost his father while he was fighting againist arabs. So i wonder that, it is exactly my opinion.If Turks were leaning to slaughtering armenians, why did they do the genocide when the empire was fighting in 6 fronts.Why didnt they prefer to kill armenians in 1500s, they were ruling the whole world at that time?Let me answer to my questions.While fihgting againist Russians, Arabs, Anzacs , Greeks ,Bulgarians, Serbians, English, French, İtalians the entire army, even localized gendarmenies halfly managed to war.So without gendarmeries at countrysides, the civil war has started between kurds and armenians.So the goverment decided to immigrate armenians to the south where kurds are less in population.And they sent gendarmenie forces to assist armenian convoys to the south but at that century with dieases and attacks of kurds, many armenians died, as kurds.That is the true story. But poor armenians wants to belive that genocide because that is the last thing they had to believe.That is the whole answer to their poverty , their smallness and failure.Their all politics is built up on this lie. Ihave much to say about this sub.But as i see this topic is turned to "Armenian Genocide Thesis".So stop commenting about genocide please.I wish i would be the last who comment on this sub.Just comment what you think abou Turks.