It is generally argued that people should agree with their living condition; meanwhile, other dispel this notion, believing that they have to try their best to get over these situations. In my opinion, I believe that there are two sides to this issue.

One the one hand, it is a fact beyond dispute that there are some reasons for the first view point. Firstly, some people do not have good health for improving their life condition. To be specific, although some people really want to find a job that could bring them satisfactory, their physical possibility does not allow them to change their job. Secondly, the limit of their knowledge prevent people from opportunities to improve their life. In other words, people who do not have a good educational status are difficult to find a high salary job. As a result, people will accept their situations no matter how unsatisfy it is.

In the other hand, others’ support of the second viewpoint can be bolstered in several ways. First and foremost, it is characteristic of people that force them to improve their present situation. That is to say, some people never accept what they have and always try their best to make it better day by day by learning and working hard. Additionally, family condition is an important reason that motivate people to improve their life condition. A study has shown that people who are breadwinner are normally success than others because they have to try any way to improve their situation for raising their family.

To conclude then, in line with the previous discussion, I am convicted to assert that a person should not accept their situations and find a way to improve such unsatisfy condition.

It is generally argued that people should agree with (wrong verb) their living condition; meanwhile, other (wrong form) dispel this notion, believing that they have to try their best to get over these situations. In my opinion, I believe that there are two sides to this issue. (That is not an opinion on this topic. It is not an issue or problem statement. Besides, every issue has two sides, so when you say this, you aren't giving any real information.)

One the one hand, it is a fact beyond dispute that there are some reasons for the first view point. (wrong form - Viewpoint is one word) First, Firstly, some people do not have good health for improving their life condition. (I do not understand this) To be specific, although some people really want to find a job that could bring them satisfactory, (wrong form) their physical possibility (wrong expression) does not allow them to change their job. Secondly, Second, the limit of their knowledge prevent (wrong form) people from taking advantage of opportunities to improve their life. In other words, people who do not have a good educational status (wrong expression) are difficult to find a high-paying salary job. As a result, people will accept their situations no matter how unsatisfy (wrong form) it is.

In (wrong word) the other hand, others’ support of the second viewpoint can be justified / supported bolstered in several ways. First and foremost, it is a human characteristic to want of people that force them to improve their the present situation. That is to say, some people never accept what they have and always try their best to make it better day by day by learning and working hard. Additionally, family condition (wrong expression) is an important reason that motivate people to improve their life condition. A study has shown that people who are breadwinner (wrong form) are normally success (wrong form) than others because they have to try any way to improve their situation to raise for raising their family.

To conclude then, in line with the previous discussion, I am convicted (wrong word. Criminals are convicted of crimes. ) to assert that a person should not accept their situations (wrong form) and find a way to improve such unsatisfy (wrong form) condition.

Thanks for your help Emotion: big smile