Developments in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Many hold the believe that technological developments have caused a variety of enviroment implications. Others argue that citizens should adopt simpler lifestyles to protect the environment. Personally, i completely agree with both these view points.

On the one hand, technology innovations lead to various consequences for the surroundings in a number of ways. First, the proliferation of technological breakthroughs engender ever-increasing number of industrial companies. When industrial corparations oparate, a staggering amount of carbon dioxit emission is produced on a daily basis and discharged into the atmosphere, causing air pollution. Second, in the race to employ technological marvels to make more cost-effective products, a large number of firms adopt unsustainable business practices. For example, enterprises exploited natural resources at an alarming rate in order to facilitate for their mass-produce process, thereby compromising the environment.

On the other hand, leading a simpler way of life plays an important role to solve environmental problems. For instance, by using bicycles instead of automobiles, citizens can take pressure off the Earth by reducing fuel. A lower volume of fossil fuel harnessed means minimizing human’s impact on the surroundings. Furthermore, each inhahbitant enviromently-friendly lifestyles make a considerable contribution in the process of protecting the planet earth. If dwellers reuse plastic bottles, the volume of their daily wastes will significantly decrease and the problems of pollution will be solved.

In conclusion, although technology progress has negative contributions on the environment, people can have a crucial role to play by leading a simpler way of life.

I have highlighted in yellow the text that has mistakes.


Many hold the believe (wrong word) that technological developments have caused a variety of enviroment implications. (wrong word) Others (wrong word - There is not conflict between these two statements. ) argue that citizens should adopt simpler lifestyles to protect the environment. Personally, i (wrong word) completely agree with both these view points.

On the one hand, technology innovations lead to various consequences for the surroundings in a number of ways. First, the proliferation (wrong word) of technological breakthroughs engender (wrong word) an ever-increasing number of industrial companies. When industrial corparations (wrong word) oparate, (wrong word) a staggering amount of carbon dioxit (wrong word) emission is produced on a daily basis and discharged into the atmosphere, causing air pollution. Second, in the race to employ technological marvels (wrong word) to make more cost-effective products, a large number of firms adopt unsustainable business practices. For example, enterprises exploited natural resources at an alarming rate in order to facilitate for their mass-produce process, (wrong phrase) thereby compromising the environment.

On the other hand, leading a simpler way of life plays an important role to solve in solving environmental problems. For instance, by using bicycles instead of automobiles, citizens can take pressure off the Earth by consuming less reducing fuel. A lower volume of fossil fuel harnessed (wrong word) means minimizing human’s (wrong form) impact on the surroundings. Furthermore, each inhahbitant enviromently-friendly lifestyles (wrong form) make a considerable contribution in the process of protecting the planet earth. If dwellers (wrong word) reuse plastic bottles, the volume of their daily wastes (wrong form) will significantly decrease and the problems of pollution will be solved.

In conclusion, although technology technological progress has negative effects contributions on the environment, people can have a crucial role to play in solving the problem by leading a simpler way of life.