+1

Some people think that one of the most effective ways to deal with environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?


These days, environmental problems are always the hot topic; hence, many ways have been suggested to tackled these issues. One of these is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. In my view, I completely disagree with this suggestion. I will be explaining my view in the forthcoming paragraphs.

First of all, increasing cost of fuel won’t put no pressure on the rich. Because they have abilities to afford cost, they would prefer to their private cars than public transportations. As a result, the exhaust decreased from the people who use public tranpsportations such as buses, trains, and so on instead of cars to save their money can’t make a great impact on the environment problems.

Moreover, the public transportations of some countries are not developed well, which causes inconvenience for using. Therefore, many people would rather go by their cars or other vehicles than public transportations, regardless of the high cost of fuel. For instance, in Vietnam, the buses or trains are not highly appreciated for many reasons such as the delays, the poor hygiene. Due to these disadvantages, the large of citizens choose to use their their private cars in daily living. In other words, even if the price were increased, people would still travel on a daily basis and the problems of pollution would stay unsolved.

In conclusion, I belive that increasing the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to deal with environmental problems has many obvious drawbacks; and that some other methods should be adopted instead.


I would be so grateful for your response ^.^

+1

These days, environmental problems are always the a hot topic; hence, many ways have been suggested to tackled tackle these issues. One of these is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. In my view, I completely disagree with this suggestion for several reasons. I will be explaining my view in the forthcoming paragraphs.

First of all, increasing cost of fuel [ 1] won’t will put no pressure on the rich. Because they have abilities to can afford cost, to pay even for expensive fuel, they would prefer likely continue to use their private cars rather than switch to public transportation. As a result, the exhaust fumes and other emissions would not decrease from the people who use public tranpsportations such as buses, trains, and so on instead of cars to save their money can’t sufficiently to make a great impact on the environmental problems of pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.

Moreover, the public transportation networks of in some countries are not developed, well, which causes inconvenience for using. makes them inconvenient to use. Therefore, many people would rather go by their cars or other vehicles than use the local buses, trams or trains, public transportations, regardless of the high cost of fuel. For instance, in Vietnam, the buses or trains are not highly appreciated regarded, for many reasons such as the delays, the congestion, and the poor hygiene. Due to these disadvantages, the a large proportion of citizens in that country choose to use drive their their private cars in their daily commute. living. In other words, even if the price of fuel were was increased, people would still travel on a daily basis drive to work or college, and the problems of pollution would remain unresolved. stay unsolved.

In conclusion, I belive that increasing the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to deal with would not solve environmental problems because many people can afford the price increase and also because often no viable transportation alternative is available. has many obvious drawbacks; and that some other methods should be adopted instead.

---------------------------------------

[ 1]: You had a double negative there! Also, do not use contractions in formal writing.