This question has been answered · 21 replies
My example is: I could of picked up the praying mantis to observe it, but that might of hurt the mantis.
I believe that is incorrect and corrected I have: I could have picked up the praying mantic to observe it, but that might have hurt the mantis.
Could someone check this and make sure I am doing this correctly? Any explanation would be greatly appreciated!!!
Approved answer (verified by fivejedjon)
'of' is sometimes used in error in the place of 'have'. Presumably because in speech 'have' is often slurred/shortened to 've', which sounds more like 'of'.
Could of, would of, should of are always incorrect.
AnonymousWell, of course.Zerox"Could of" ... does not exist.I suppose that has some paradoxical value.
eg. she is part OF a group. ( a group. the noun preceded by it's preposition)
could ... is an adverb which describes the verb
eg. she COULD be part OF the group ... (COULD describes the verb TO BE)
It follows from the above that the expression:
COULD OF has no sensible grammatical meaning.... (ie. an ADVERB describing a PREPOSITION)
COULD HAVE is an adverb describing the verb (HAVE) which follows it; this has a sensible grammatical meaning.
I have been thinking I had lost my mind without having noticed, as each time I saw "could of" or "would of", I became extremely infuriated.
Seeing the incorrect grammar on message boards, forums and on blogs, made me feel insulted and very angry. So much so, I would close the webpage, and fume for a little.
Speaking to others, I learned that the incorrect way is being taught as proper grammar by some teachers.
People are waiting to help.
Related forum topics: