Some people think that newspapers are the best way to get news. However, others believe that they can get news better through other media platforms. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people argue that readinng newspapers is the most effective way to receive news, while others consider the opposite resulting from kinds of website. With the convenience in following brand-new informations, I believe there is no longer the best way to get the news as opposed to online resources.

On the one hand, although we are living in digital world, it can be denied the popularity of newspaper with newsreaders. First of all, old generation enjoys getting notified by paper due to their habit taken shape in a long time before the introduction of the Internet. For instance, my grandfather prefers to receive news on papers rather than smart devices which is caused by the difficulty of technology adaption. Secondly, newspapers are contained more reliable sources of informations compared to other sources. In fact, informations are not only written by professional journalists, but also thoroughly cheked, iedited and censored prior to their publication. Meanwhile, that media platforms try to keep news up to date leads to erroneous informations, instead of checking the authenticity of sources.

On the other hand, thanks to the constant of advancement in technology, people are atracted by uncomplicated access to online news. For example, with portable devices, it is unchallenging for citizens to retrieve a significant storage of items in a few clicks. Furthermore, getting informed by websites brings a more interesting reading experience based on different means of communication. In today's world, there are various videos or audio recordings are published for people so that they can update news while doing other things, such as driving or cooking. Additionally, as I mentioned before, one of the advantages of online news is always around-the-clock which allow everyone to catch up informations anytime, a mere newspaper cannot do.

In conclusion, I do admit the reputation of printed newspaper amongst certain groups of people, however I think that using the Internet to read news is the best way because of accessibility it produces.

You are trying to write sophisticated, complex and advanced English, but your skills are not quite strong enough. Keep studying and practicing. Write simpler sentences in words that you understand very well so that your good argument points can be understood.


Some people argue that readinng (spelling) newspapers is the most effective way to receive news, while others consider that television, radio and internet websites are superior. the opposite resulting from kinds of website. (Poor English. It is not understandable.) With the convenience in following (That makes no sense.) brand-new informations, (Information is non-count. We do not use the plural form.) I believe there is no longer a best way to get the news. (You are saying that newspapers, TV, radio and the internet are all equal in effectiveness.) as opposed to online resources.

On the one hand, although we are living in a digital world, it can be denied the popularity (Ungrammatical ) of newspaper with newsreaders. First of all, old generation older people enjoy getting the news from the daily newspaper notified by paper due to their habit which was formed taken shape in a long time before the introduction of the Internet. For instance, my grandfather prefers to look at the newspaper receive news on papers rather than smart devices. He never got used to electronic devices such as laptops and smartphones. which is caused by the difficulty of technology adaption. Secondly, Second, newspapers are contained (The passive voice is wrong.) contain more reliable sources of informations (Information is non-count. We do not use the plural form.) compared to other sources. In fact, informations the articles are not only written by professional journalists, but also thoroughly cheked,(spelling) edited and censored prior to their publication. Meanwhile, that media platforms try to keep the news up to date and that leads to erroneous informations, (Information is non-count. We do not use the plural form.) ; instead of checking the authenticity of sources and accuracy of the reports are not checked.

On the other hand, thanks to the constant of advancement in technology, (That makes no sense. There have been advancements in technology for the past hundred thousand years.) people are atracted (spelling) by uncomplicated easy access to online news. For example, with portable devices, it is unchallenging for citizens to anyone can retrieve articles on nearly any subject a significant storage of items (very poor English) in a few clicks. Furthermore, getting informed by websites brings a more interesting reading experience since the published new stories often contain pictures, graphics, live video or audio recordings taken at the event. People can watch and listen based on different means of communication. In today's world, there are various videos or audio recordings are published for people so that they can update news (incorrect. People do not update the news unless they are reporters or bloggers.) while doing other things, such as driving or cooking. Additionally, as I mentioned before, (Do not refer to your text with "mentioned") one of the advantages of online news is that it is updated always around-the-clock which allows everyone to catch up informations (Information is non-count. We do not use the plural form.) anytime; newspapers have to be printed and distributed, so they are always behind. a mere newspaper cannot do.

In conclusion, I do admit the reputation of printed newspaper amongst certain groups of people, (Comma splice error) however I think that using the Internet to read news is the best way because of its timeliness and accessibility it produces.