Some people think that governments should use the money to provide faster means of public transport, while others are concerned that there are many more important priorities than public transport.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Politics fund is perceived as one of the most crucial problems in determining the economy of their country. There is a reality that while some people state that fast communal vehicles should be supplied, others advocate the viewpoint that there are more essential things than rapid social conveyance. This essay deals with controversial topics from a different perspective.
It is widely assumed that union capital for high-speed transportation would undoubtedly bring a variety of benefits to their state. One of the most prominent points mentioned is reducing environmental pollution. For instance, in the total greenhouse gas emissions, road transport accounts for 75% and is expected to increase in the future in VietNam. With regard to social matters, another value of brisk community transit is that it makes travel distances shorter. Apparently, You only need to spend 1 hour and 15 minutes to go from Vinh to Hanoi by plane, compared to a coach which takes about 8-9 hours. In brief, the potential benefits of quick civil conveyance are deniable.
Nevertheless, despite the positive sides, there are other viewpoints about utilizing ministry checks for other factors. The first point to cite is that education can be lacking a lot of staff. Particularly, in the 2020-2021, there is a nationwide shortage of more than 95,000 public preschool teachers in Viet Nam. One standpoint advocating health services indicates that it is missing a large number of medical equipment and supplies. Particularly, The number of severe cases at Cu Chi COVID-19 Treatment Hospital is increasing due to the increasing number of cases, the hospital has more than 700 patients but currently has 15 ventilators both invasive and non-invasive.
In summary, based on the brief analysis above, it is evident that there are both advantages and disadvantages of spending money on swift national transit. Nonetheless, compared with most other social issues, under different circumstances, the arguments about these problems need to be flexibly evaluated. In my perspective, it is vital to spend money on education.
Please post essays, paragraphs, dialogues and other writing in the essay forum so a moderator does not have to move your post. Click on this link:
https://www.englishforums.com/English/EssayReportCompositionWriting/Forum9.htm
Next, tap on the green button "write a new post"
cat zany 772Politics fund is perceived as one of the most crucial problems in determining the economy of their country.
That is not a good opening.
It is not good English. "Politics fund" is not a valid phrase.
"Determining the economy" is not good English.
cat zany 772This essay deals with controversial topics from a different perspective.
That is not good. The prompt asks you to give your opinion, so give your opinion.
There are only two opinions. There is no third or fourth or any other "different perspective" that is in this task.
Politics fund (bad English) is perceived as one of the most crucial problems in determining the economy (Not good English. Off-topic) of their country. There is a reality that (That is not a good clause. Avoid "dummy-it clauses.) while some people state that fast communal (wrong word) vehicles should be supplied, others advocate the viewpoint that there are more essential things than rapid social conveyance. (Not a good phrase) This essay deals with controversial topics from a different perspective. (Give your opinion. Do not write "essay")
It is widely assumed that union capital (bad English) for government investments in high-speed transportation would undoubtedly bring a variety of benefits to the their state. One of the most prominent points mentioned (Do not use "mentioned") is reducing environmental air pollution. For instance, in of the total greenhouse gas emissions, road transport accounts for 75% and that is expected to increase in the future in VietNam. With regard to social matters, another value of brisk (wrong word) community transit is that it makes travel distances shorter. Apparently, You (incorrect capital letter. ) only need to spend 1 hour and 15 minutes to go from Vinh to Hanoi by plane, compared to a coach which takes about 8-9 hours. In brief, the potential benefits of quick civil conveyance (not a good phrase) are deniable. (wrong word - That is opposite of what you are trying to say.)
Nevertheless, despite the positive sides, there are other viewpoints about how government spending should be prioritized. utilizing ministry checks (bad English) for other factors. (wrong word) The first point to cite is A majority point out that education can be schools at all levels are lacking a lot of staff. Particularly, in the 2020-2021, there is a nationwide shortage of more than 95,000 public preschool teachers in Viet Nam. One standpoint Another group advocating health services indicates that it is missing (ungrammatical) a large number of modern medical equipment and supplies are needed in public hospitals.. Particularly, The (incorrect capital letter. ) number of severe cases at Cu Chi COVID-19 Treatment Hospital is increasing. The due to the increasing number of cases, hospital has more than 700 patients but currently has only 15 ventilators both invasive and non-invasive.(That makes no sense.)
In summary, based on the brief analysis above, it is evident that although there are both advantages and disadvantages of spending money on swift national rapid transit, Nonetheless, compared with most other social issues, under different circumstances, the arguments about these problems need to be flexibly evaluated. in my perspective, opinion, it is more important vital to spend money on education, specifically training and employing more teachers..