+0

Topic: Some people think that the development of technology has made our life more complex and the solution is to live a simpler life without that technology. To what extent do you agree or disagree?


In the present age, some people argue that technological evolution has made our life more complicated and the solution is to remove smart devices from our life. Personally, I disagree with this statement.


Some people opine that the development of modern devices has rendered our life more complicated because this development results in risks of Internet security such as private information leakage. However, this thinking is flawed, the technological evolution also allows humans to create software that could protect users' information such as BKAV. In addition, this development has invigorated the government to introduce new legislation which has tightened controls over cybercrime. Hence, information leakage is not a huge problem when this development has happened.


On the other hand, there are myriad compelling reasons why people should live a life within technology. To begin with, technology has rendered humans' life more convenient. This is because the development of technology ushered in a new era of people's life; people could communicate with another person instantly, instead of writing letters, or robots could help humans deal with tedious daily tasks and dangerous work. In addition, today, modern equipment has pervaded humans' life, merely smartphones. So if smart devices disappear, people might feel inconvenient as evidenced by most people do not crave to wait day by day to receive a letter.


In conclusion, I am dissatisfied with the argument that humans should live without modern devices and subscribe to the view that technological evolution offers benefits to our life.

Note: I want to know which band i can achieve with this esssy?

+0

Please post essays, paragraphs, dialogues and other writing in the essay forum so a moderator does not have to move your post. Click on this link:
https://www.englishforums.com/English/EssayReportCompositionWriting/Forum9.htm

Next, tap on the green button "write a new post"

+0

The topic is not good English. It is not by a native speaker.

The "development of technology" has been going on for more than a hundred thousand years.

Topic: Some people think that the development of the internet and mobile phones technology has made our life more complex and the solution is to live a simpler life without that technology. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Site Hint: Check out our list of pronunciation videos.
+0

In the present age, (That is a rather meaningless phrase. the present tense verb gives the time frame.)Some people argue that technological evolution the internet and related communications technologies have has made our life more complicated and the solution is to remove smart devices from our life. Personally, I (To what extent? You need an adverb of extent.) disagree with this statement.

(You need a body paragraph that supports your position. The topic of the first paragraph should be this:

First, the risks of using these devices are overblown.

That clearly supports your disagreement. You did not start correctly, that is the first reason for your disagreement.


Some people opine (This verb is only for special contexts. I personally have never used it.) believe that the development of modern devices has rendered our life more complicated because we are more at risk of identity theft. this development results in risks of Internet security (That really does not follow.) such as private information leakage. However, this thinking is flawed, the technological evolution also allows humans t (Use "human" only in the context of comparison with other species, including artificial life. It is also used in set phrases - examples are: human resources, human experience, human being, human rights. ) people / software developers to create software that could protect users' information such as BKAV. (Do not use acronyms without defining them. I have no idea what BKAV is.) In addition, this development has invigorated the government to introduce new legislation which has tightened controls over cybercrime. Hence, information leakage is not a major huge problem when this development has happened.


On the other hand, (Wrong transition. You need two arguments that support your position. "On the other hand" is for opposite opinions, not the same opinion.) there are myriad compelling reasons why people should live a life fully taking advantage of the benefits it can bring. within technology. To begin with, technology has rendered humans' life our lives more convenient. This is because the development of technology ushered in a new era of people's life; people could communicate with another person instantly, instead of writing letters, or robots could help us humans deal with tedious daily tasks and dangerous work. In addition, today, modern equipment has pervaded our lives, especially humans' life, merely (wrong word) smartphones. So if smart devices disappear, people might feel inconvenient as evidenced by most people do not want crave to wait day by day to receive a letter.

(Your arguments are not very strong. There are many more hazards to the internet than theft of private information.)

In conclusion, I am dissatisfied do not agree with the argument that we humans should live without modern devices and subscribe to the view that new inventions technological evolution offers benefits to our life.

Teachers: We supply a list of EFL job vacancies