+0
* Please check my writing and correct wrong parts or sentences into right ones. Thank you in advance for your teaching.

For contradiction on words "Nuclear Umbrella",

Today I saw it on a newspaper. If North Korea attacks us by nuclear weapon, America will instead of us shoot nuclear missile to North Korea.
Now American nuclear submarine is under the sea of ours. Our government has announced we're protected by the programme of "Unclear Umbrella".

Let's think for statue with "Unclear Umbrella" a little more.
If North Korea first attack us, It is saying that we has to get a damage from unclear weapon first.
As you see the full extent of Japanese damage caused in the World War 2, up to now there are some people crying for its pain and damage.
After harming such a big damage, what is the counter attack "nuclear Umbrella" used for?

Okay. Let's assume we should attack first when they have a certain foreshadower to use a nuclear weapon.
You know, the owner of that nuclear submarine is not us, it is American president's,which means whether when and why to push the button or not depends on all of the America's.
How tragical a life of our country is.
How can we let the other country's leader decide the future of our country?

When looking for its meaning in the Wiki, "Nuclear Umbrella" defines a guarantee by a nuclear weapon state to defend a non-nuclear allied state.

I'd like to ask America how can you guarantee that you can protect us against nuclear weapons.
Attack first? the counter attack shortly after our getting a nuclear weapon? neither can be a reasonable solution.
It is only concluding a peace agreement.
Furthermore, due to a dispute between North Korea and America, I don't want to stand our country has to become a battlefield.
Because the people who would get damage is Korean.
+1
Hi SJ

I liked your piece. I can't really correct it, point by point, but here is how an English writer might put it (with as little change to your writing as possible) ...

Best regards, Dave

The “Nuclear Umbrella” is a self-contradiction

Today I read in a newspaper: if North Korea attack us with nuclear weapons, America will, on our behalf, fire nuclear missiles at North Korea. That is why an American nuclear submarine is under our seas. Our government has announced that we're protected by the programme of the "Nuclear Umbrella".

Let's think for a moment about this "Nuclear Umbrella". If North Korea attack us first, that means we will get the damage from a nuclear weapon first. We now know the full extent of the damage in Japan caused in World War II: there are still many people crying because of that pain and damage. After suffering such terrible damage, what would a "Nuclear Umbrella" counter attack achieve?

Okay. Let's assume we should attack first when they have a definite threat to use a nuclear weapon. You know, the owner of that nuclear submarine is not us, it is the American president's, which means whether, when and why to push the button or not depends entirely on America. How tragic the life of our country is. How can we let another country's leader decide the future of our country?

When looking for its meaning in the Wiki, "Nuclear Umbrella" defines a guarantee by a nuclear weapon state to defend a non-nuclear allied state.

I'd like to ask America: how can you guarantee that you can protect us against nuclear weapons? Attack first? Or the counter attack shortly after our getting a nuclear weapon? Neither can be a reasonable solution. It can only be settled by concluding a peace agreement. Furthermore, in the event of a dispute between North Korea and America, I don't want our country to become a battlefield, because the only people who will get hurt are Korean.

- - -
Comments  
I really thank you so much for your writing. I have found there are a lot of errors in my writing compared to yours.
The reason why I wrote this here is that I want to learn how to connect a sentence into another sentence. It is so difficult for me. Because once I repair a sentence, I feel I need to repair next sentence either all the time. I mean, I don't know how to make the context in my writing can be smooth. Thanks once again for your correction and teaching,Dave_AnonEmotion: embarrassed.