Some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

These days, the increase in people who are prone to health illness has been receiving the public's attention. It is said that eating a huge amount of fast food has caused this issue. One solution is proposed that governments should tax higher prices on fast food. In my opinion, I suppose that this measure might not be completely practical

It is obvious to say that there is a host of reasons why people enjoy fast food a lot. First, due to the fact that junk food is convenient, this is the best choice for someone who does not have time to prepare meals. Second, since some of the people whose living standard is not good, there are no alternatives for them to select such as organic food. Moreover, because of the variety of fast food, it would be affordable for customers to purchase.

With all the reasons are mentioned above, it is clear to see that increasing tax on fast food might not be efficient. First, if the price of fast food goes higher, there will be much fewer choices of foods for them, which will eventually lead them to a harder life. Second, this measure might not primary because people put the convenience of fast food on a higher priority than healthy food. For example, children are big fans of junk food simply because it takes them a quick to order and then they are full to go to extra classes.

Therefore, so as to cope with this issue, it would be better if governments encouraged people to consume more healthy food. To do that money could be spent to educate people about the negative effects of fast food, namely obesity, diabetes,etc..Besides, organic food organizations could offer some purchase discounts to help people buy healthy food.

In conclusion, although fast food brings drawbacks to customers'health, charging a higher tax on them would not be efficient. In lieu of it, governments should focus on promoting a healthy lifestyle to citizens.

In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?


These days, the increase in the number of people who are prone to (incorrect expression. Everybody is prone to getting sick! ) health illness has been receiving the public's attention. (That is not related to the topic. The essay topic description did not say anything about public attention. ) It is said that eating a huge amount of too much fast food has caused people to have health problems. issue. One solution is proposed that governments should tax higher prices (incorrect expression - we do not tax a price. We tax the item itself.) on fast food. In my opinion, I suppose that this measure might not be completely practical (missing punctuation)

( You did not answer the topic question: To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Extent requires an adverb - e.g I completely agree. I partially agree. I somewhat disagree. I mostly agree. I totally disagree.)


It is obvious to say that There is (wrong form) a host of reasons why people enjoy fast food a lot. First, due to the fact that junk food is convenient, this is the best choice for someone who does not have time to prepare meals. Second, since some of the people whose living standard is not good, there are no alternatives for them to select such as organic food. Moreover, because of the low prices of variety of fast food, it would be affordable for customers to purchase. (Variety does not relate to affordability.)


With all the reasons are mentioned above, it is clear to see that increasing tax on fast food might not be effective. efficient. First, if the price of fast food goes higher, there will be much fewer choices of foods for them, which will eventually lead them to a harder life. Second, this measure might not primary because people put the convenience of fast food on a higher priority than healthy food. For example, children (wrong word. Children are aged 0-14. Normally they do not order meals; their parents do.) are big fans of junk food simply because it takes them a quick to order and then they are full to go to extra classes.


Therefore, so as to cope with this issue, it would be better if governments encouraged people to consume more healthy food. To do that money could be spent to educate people about the negative effects of fast food, namely obesity, diabetes,etc.. (Never use ellipses, "etc." or "and so on" in academic essays. It is very bad form.) Besides, organic food organizations could offer some purchase discounts to help people buy healthy food.


In conclusion, although fast food brings drawbacks to customers'health, charging a higher tax on them would not be efficient. In lieu of it, governments should focus on promoting a healthy lifestyle to citizens.

Instead of proposing higher tax on the fast food, its better to encourage people in eating healthy foods and discourage them eating junk foods at the fast food. We should think solutions that would benefit people without affecting other peoples businesses.

Students: We have free audio pronunciation exercises.

For me promoting healthy lifestyle is one of the step to lessen the number of people who are suffering from health problem. imposing higher tax in any kinds of junk foods are not the solution instead give importance of using healthy foods.

the problem of one person's health is his or her choice because we all know that foods is blessings but it is on her decision whether he will choice to eat foods that he already know that it is not healthy so why impose a higher tax on this kind of food. but for the manufacturer of this kind of food make sure that the no one will get harm. and another thing is the way we manage our eating habits also affect our health.