Please help me to clarify this:
Change this sentence into negative (in 3 ways).
"I used to fly a kite when I was a little kid."
My answers are:
1. I didn't use to fly a kite when I was a little kid.
2. I never used to fly a kite when I was a little kid.
3. I used not to fly a kite when I was a little kid.
And the answers I got from the questioner are these:
1. I used not to fly a kite when I was a little kid.
2. I used to not fly a kite when I was a little kid.
3. I didn't use to fly a kite when I was a little kid.
I told him that number 2 is incorrect. You can't split the infinitive 'to fly' in 'I used to fly' with 'not', but he insisted that it is correct and acceptable in spoken English. He also said that I should see the article about 'used to' in Swan's Practicle English Usage page 604. The problem is I don't have that book, so I can't argue about this issue with him. I have provided him with different references, though.
Please, please, pretty please help me with this.
Calling for Mister Micawber and Paul Tranter . . .
Change this sentence into negative (in 3 ways).
"I used to fly a kite when I was a little kid."
My answers are:
1. I didn't use to fly a kite when I was a little kid.
2. I never used to fly a kite when I was a little kid.
3. I used not to fly a kite when I was a little kid.
And the answers I got from the questioner are these:
1. I used not to fly a kite when I was a little kid.
2. I used to not fly a kite when I was a little kid.
3. I didn't use to fly a kite when I was a little kid.
I told him that number 2 is incorrect. You can't split the infinitive 'to fly' in 'I used to fly' with 'not', but he insisted that it is correct and acceptable in spoken English. He also said that I should see the article about 'used to' in Swan's Practicle English Usage page 604. The problem is I don't have that book, so I can't argue about this issue with him. I have provided him with different references, though.
Please, please, pretty please help me with this.
Calling for Mister Micawber and Paul Tranter . . .
Comments
The form is actually "used to" + bare infinitive, not "used" + to-infinitive. So it is not "technically" a split infinitive to put the adverb after "used to." However, the strongly preferred formal negation is "used not to."
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/used+to?r=66
See: Usage note
The most common negative form of used to is didn't used to (or didn't use to), but in formal contexts used not to is preferred.
But the alternate "used to not" is found in everyday speech. Here are some sample quotes from the American Corpus:
I used to not care about marriage until I fell in love.
That used to not be OK with me, but now it is.
I used to not follow through on things.
She used to not wear dresses. She hated to wear dresses.
They're coming back in Florida now, Ohio, Montana, where they used to not exist at all.
" He makes me slow down and eat lunch, which I used to not do, " she laughs. " We have different philosophies. "
I'm an English teacher as well.
So would it be correct (acceptable) to answer this kind of question in an exam with "I used to not fly a kite when I was a little kid"?
But the Google Ngram viewer indicates that "used to not" is trending.
http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=didn%27t+used+to%2Cused+to+not%2Cused+not+to&year_st...
1. Grammatically speaking
There is no problem with any of the 6 sentences as written in Juliar's post.
If you listen to Swan (2005), you can even use the contraction 'usedn't'
"I usedn't to like opera." I used not to like opera.
I think all would agree that this is most unusual construction.
2. Common usage and natural sounding language
The problem here is that what is common and natural depends on the English you are used to.
I assert the view that, 'never used to,' followed by 'didn't used to,' would be the most common
ways of expressing the negative. I accept that there may be differing opinions on this.
Likewise, there will be differing opinions on Juliar's point about splitting the infinitive.
I have no problem with, '...used not to...'
This, once again, is simply a debate between prescriptive and descriptive grammarians.
The issue is dealt with by Swan in topic 604 on page 595. (Not page 604)
Juliar, please check your yahoo email.