Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is thought by some that economic growth is the best way to eliminate poverty and hunger while others believe that it jeopardizes our environment and should be stopped. In my opinion, a growth in economy is indispensable for a country to tackle poverty.

Admittedly, the environment is somewhat impacted when a country is growing economically. The reason is when businesses are flourishing, many industries use a fossil fuel, such as coal and oil for running their plants. This causes carbon emission into the atmosphere which in turn leads to global warming that is detrimental to the overall environment. However, many countries plant trees and run various conservation programs as the remedial measures. China, for example, is considered to be the most pollution producing country as its economy grew by a whopping 6% per annum in last ten years. But, it has planted plethora of trees and plants so that air pollution can be alleviated.

Conversely, some are of the view that poverty can only be eliminated with the help of a economic growth. They believe so because more jobs would be created and businesses would be established. People will be able to earn money and support their families in terms of bearing household expenses. Consequently, a number of people suffering from poverty and hunger will be reduced significantly. Take Japan for instance. The economy of the country registered a continuous growth of 7% in last three years, reducing the unemployment to only 2%, the lowest in the region.

In conclusion, although people argue that countries should not grow economically as it leads to problems for our environment, I believe that economic growth is the best remedy to mitigate poverty.

It is thought by some that economic growth is the best way to eliminate poverty and hunger while others believe that it jeopardizes our environment and should be stopped. In my opinion, a growth in economy is indispensable for a country to tackle poverty.

Admittedly, the environment is somewhat impacted when a country is growing economically. The reason is when businesses are flourishing, many industries use a fossil fuel, such as coal and oil for running their plants. This causes carbon emissions into the atmosphere which in turn leads to global warming that is detrimental to the overall environment. However, many countries plant trees and run various conservation programs as the remedial measures. China, for example, is considered to be the most pollution-producing country as its economy grew by an impressive whopping 6% per annum in last ten years. But, it has planted many thousands plethora of trees and plants in compensation. so that air pollution can be alleviated.

Conversely, some are of the view that poverty can only be eliminated with the help of a economic growth. They believe so because more jobs would be created and businesses would be established. People will be able to earn money and support their families in terms of bearing household expenses. Consequently, a the number of people suffering from poverty and hunger will be reduced significantly. Take Japan for instance. The economy of the country registered a continuous growth of 7% in last three years, reducing the unemployment to only 2%, the lowest in the region.

In conclusion, although people argue that countries should not grow economically as it leads to problems for our environment, I believe that economic growth is the best remedy to mitigate poverty.