Please help me. Thank you so much.

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Addressing the constantly changing weather issue has long been a challenging task for many scientists. However, there are some who think that people should make adaptation to climate change in lieu of developing an approach to stopping the effects of it. In my opinion, I do not completely agree with this viewpoint because I believe it is not too late for us to deal with this problem.

To commence with, several measures could be taken by both Government and individuals to hinder climate change. Firstly, Government should incentivize people to use public transportations instead of private vehicles. This would decrease in the amount of vehicle exhaust which comprises a tremendous carbon footprint. As a consequence, the amount of carbon emissions would be reduced, contributing less to global warming which is a part of climate change. Secondly, people, as individuals, could utilize products made from non-plastic to reduce the amount of plastics. Plastics cannot be completely destroyed, it could remain beneath the earth and pollute the soil. Furthermore, when burning plastic-based products, a large carbon footprint would be dumped into the air. Therefore, by using non-plastic products such as paper bags or paper straws, we could limit the amount of carbon dioxide which leads to global warming.

Additionally, trying to live with climate change might lead to several disastrous repercussions. Take Australia as an example, there were forest fires which destroy a large area of Australia land and kill thousands of animals. This disaster is due to the considerable increase in the temperature which is unprecedented in the past. Another serious disaster is the high rainfall patterns in China, making Government release tons of water in hydroelectric dams. As a result, many houses and villages were destroyed, and thousands of people did not have the accommodations. Those disasters are due to the climate change. Therefore, accepting and living with it is not a good idea.

In conclusion, although some may have opinions that people should try to adapt to climate change, I believe we should stop it.

Addressing the constantly changing weather issue (The topic is about climate, not weather. They are two different things.) has long been a challenging task for many scientists. (That is a little off-topic. Scientists research the nature of climate change, what is causing it, and what the effects might be.) However, there are some who think that people should adapt make adaptation to climate change in lieu of developing an approach to stopping its the effects of it. In my opinion, (redundant. "agree" is an opinion.) I do not completely agree with this viewpoint because I believe it is not too late for us to deal with this problem.

To commence with, (That is very very awkward and unnatural.) several measures could be taken by both Governments (government is a common noun.) and individuals to prevent / slow down / reverse hinder climate change. Firstly, First, governments should incentivize people to use public transportations (wrong form) instead of private vehicles. This would decrease in the amount of vehicle exhaust which comprises (wrong word) a tremendous carbon footprint. As a consequence, the amount of carbon emissions would be reduced, contributing less to global warming which is a part of climate change. (What are the other parts of climate change?) Secondly, Second, people, as individuals, could utilize products made from non-plastic paper or cloth to reduce the amount of plastics. Plastics cannot be completely destroyed, (comma splice error) it (wrong pronoun) could remain in the ground beneath the earth and pollute the soil. (Off-topic. The topic is climate change, not landfills and pollution) Furthermore, when burning plastic-based products, a large carbon footprint (wrong expression. "Carbon footprint" is the concept of the amount of greenhouse gasses potentially released by the making, using and disposing of product. It can also applied to an industry sector, or a family's living for a year.. It is not the carbon dioxide itself. So it is incorrect to say "dump the footprint.") would be dumped into the air. Therefore, by using non-plastic products such as paper bags or paper straws, (Actually, paper has a much larger carbon footprint than plastic.1 ) we could limit the amount of carbon dioxide which leads to global warming.

Additionally, trying to live with climate change might lead to several disastrous repercussions. Take Australia as an example, (comma splice error) there were forest fires which destroy (wrong form) a large area of Australia land and kill thousands of animals. This disaster is due to the considerable increase in the temperature which is unprecedented in the past. Another serious disaster is the high rainfall patterns in China, making the Government release tons of water retained by in hydroelectric dams. As a result, many houses and villages were destroyed, and thousands of people were left homeless did not have the accommodations. Those disasters are due to the climate change. Therefore, accepting and living with it is not a good idea.

In conclusion, although some may have opinions that people should try to adapt to climate change, I believe we should stop it.


1. Source: https://cascade.uoregon.edu/fall2012/expert/expert-article/

There are really good things about plastic bags—they produce less greenhouse gas, they use less water and they use far fewer chemicals compared to paper or cotton. The carbon footprint— that is, the amount of greenhouse gas that is produced during the life cycle of a plastic bag—is less than that of a paper bag or a cotton tote bag. If the most important environmental impact you wanted to alleviate was global warming, then you would go with plastic.