Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

You should write at least 250 words.

Many people argue that a person can not put any effect on improving the environment, but they think that just authorities and huge enterprise can. Personally, I completely disagree with this statement for several reasons that I will discuss in this essay.

I believe that everyone can do something for helping the environment become better. Firstly, people all know that a society is built up caused a lot of individuals, so every action from an individual can contribute to renovate the atmosphere where they live. For example, through a campaign "Global without Garbage" that is ruined for picking up garbage by the seashore, it made the habit of many endangered species nearly extinct now can have a habit to reproduce, such as the softshell turtle.

Secondly, people must know that the environment, nowadays, becomes more terrible partly because of human activities. The amount of emission from vehicles, from factories, play an extremely huge role in air pollution. So not only governments might be responsible for this but also the citizens in the world must be aware of how much carbon dioxides that people have released to the environment and make it directly impact the Ozone layer. A suitable example for this case, according to The Economist, every year, factories produce concrete in China, estimated release at least ten tones of greenhouse gases (including carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and so on) to the Earth, and create a hole on the Ozone layer.

To conclude, not only authorities and big companies have the responsibility for renovating the environment but also every individual can take part in many activities to improve "the home" where people live.

Many people argue that a person can not put (wrong verb) any effect on improving the environment, but they think that just authorities and huge (Huge is a juvenile word. It is not very impressive for a formal essay. Learn better words.) enterprise (wrong form) can. Personally, I completely disagree with this statement. for several reasons that I will discuss in this essay.

The reader knows what an essay is. They know you are going to write about your thesis statement "I disagree.." They know you are going to give reasons, one per paragraph. So that part of your sentence is completely useless. Do not announce that you are going to discuss reasons for your statement. Do not mention your essay. It will not impress an examiner.

I believe that everyone can do something to help for helping the environment become better. Firstly, First, people all know that a society is built up caused (wrong expression. Ungrammatical verb sequence.) a lot of individuals, so every action from an individual can contribute to renovate (wrong word) the atmosphere (wrong word) where they live. For example, through a campaign "Global without Garbage" that is ruined (wrong word ) for picking up garbage by the seashore, it made the habit (wrong word - a habit is something you do over and over. ) of many endangered species nearly extinct now ("endangered" means the same thing as "nearly extinct" These words are repeating the idea. They are redundant. ) can have a habit to reproduce, such as the softshell turtle.

Secondly, people must know that the environment, nowadays, becomes more terrible (wrong word) partly because of human activities. The amount of emission from vehicles, from and factories, play an extremely huge role in are the major causes of air pollution. So not only governments might be responsible for this but also the citizens in the world must be aware of how much carbon dioxides (wrong form) that people have released to the atmosphere environment and make it directly impact the Ozone layer. (That is incorrect. Carbon dioxide has nothing to do with ozone. Ozone is a gas composed of three oxygen molecules. Chemically, it is O3 . Carbon dioxide is a gas composed of molecules made of 2 oxygen atoms and one carbon atom. Its chemical formula is CO2. ) A suitable example for this case, according to The Economist, every year, factories produce concrete in China. They estimated release at least ten tones (wrong spelling) of greenhouse gases (including carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide, and so on) to the Earth, and create a hole on the Ozone layer. (Your knowledge on this subject is wrong. Ozone in the upper atmosphere is beneficial. But it was declining because the chlorofluorocarbons in dry cleaning fluids and refrigerants being released into the atmosphere were interfering with the natural process that creates O3 from ordinary oxygen gas O2 . These chemicals were banned many decades ago. THe ozone hole closed. Ozone has no relationship with global warming, climate change and the increase of greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere.)

To conclude, not only authorities and big global enterprises companies have the responsibility for renovating (wrong word) the environment but also every individual can take part in many activities to improve "the home" where people live.