The vast majority of university students concentrate on subjects that are clearly related to their future job, but there are many proponents of the idea that the third-level educational institutions should interest their students in studying more general subjects. I disagree with this statement because the main purpose of university education is to prepare to the future work, and studying too many aside lessons will be very time-consuming.

People go to universities to learn more about their future occupation, and studying something that is not related to this is unnecessary. Although university aims to give some background knowledge, the time of being there is limited, usually it’s 4-5 years, and because of the tough competition on the job market, future graduates should spend this time reasonably, paying a special attention to subjects that will help them to gain their first job. For example, in the UK, 85% of employees admit that their junior staff know a lot about sociology, but have a luck of knowledge about their major.

An excessive number of lessons will cause overload among students. With additional lectures, such as philosophy, the amount of information that learners need to process will increase. Moreover, adolescents will have more homework, and therefore, won’t have time for their personal life. All of this will have an adverse impact on their well-being and will make their life more stressful. To illustrate this, recent research concluded that over the past 10 years, the amount of information in a university programme has increased by 30%, and 37% of students in this institution feel themselves depressed.

In conclusion, students in university should focus only on their major subjects because the main aim of their studying there is to make themselves ready to their future job, and having too many general lessons will cause unnecessary workload.

Can you assess my essay according to IELTS criteria?