The best way to solve the world's traffic and environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion?


It is argued that imposing higher fuel prices is the best measure to cope with the global issues related to traffic and the environment. Personally, I completely disagree with this statement as it seems not to work and there are various methods to tackle the problems.


First, regardless of theoretical beliefs in reducing the number of commuters, raising fuel costs cannot be an effective solution to the current problems. There is no denying that traveling is a necessary activity for humans. People will continue using their private means, which makes them feel convenient, although they are able to struggle with significant increases in fuel prices. Furthermore, many detrimental elements contribute to the growing problems, not only from toxic emissions by transportation but also mainly from industrial activities. In fact, increasing prices of fuel can help limit a small part of the pollution from traffic vehicles but not remarkably affect them when factories and individuals create many environmentally harmful activities.


It should be noted that people can implement many alternative solutions to deal with these hot issues. Research into finding other powerful resources should be strengthened instead of introducing new regulations on fuel costs. Governments and private groups can invest in new innovations and inventions such as electric cars and non-fume manufacturing forms. Educating their citizens about environmental protection also plays a more crucial role than imposing the higher prices of fuel. If people are more aware of the damage that they are likely to face, they will tend to minimize bad habits and use public transport or green products.


In conclusion, I believe that increasing fuel costs will not have any effect and that people can find other more effective solutions to tackle those problems.

(282 words)

The best way to solve the world's traffic and environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion?

It is argued by some that imposing higher fuel prices is the best measure to cope with the global issues related to address the problems of traffic congestion and the environmental pollution. Personally, I completely I disagree with this statement, as it seems not to work and I believe that there are various alternative methods to tackle these problems.

First, [ 1] regardless of theoretical beliefs in reducing the number of commuters, raising fuel prices costs cannot be an effective solution to reduce the use of cars. the current problems. [ 2] There is no denying that traveling is a necessary activity for humans. In other words, people will continue using their private cars even if fuel becomes more expensive. We see this now, with the oil price at record levels globally. This is because there are no alternative forms of transport that are cheap and convenient for most people. means, which makes them feel convenient, although they are able to struggle with significant increases in fuel prices.

-------------------------------

[ 1]: That is a terrible topic sentence. It is ungrammatical and meaningless. Do not complicate your phrasing. Write clear, concise and straightforward sentences. Impress the examiner with persuasive (clever) ideas and examples instead.

[ 2]: Avoid such cliches (there is no denying).

The rest of your text is poorly phrase. Rephrase it by writing clear and grammatical sentences. Again, DO NOT complicate your writing. Post below.

Thank you!

This is the new second paragraph of the body! Please, help me! I will complete the conclusion later! Emotion: big smile

Many thanks!
___________________________________________

Furthermore, there are many alternative solutions that are more effective than increasing fuel prices. To cope with traffic congestion better, people, for example, are able to implement research into manufacturing driverless cars that have the capacity to safely find the best road without being stuck in crowded places. In comparison with humans' ability to drive, automatic cars will help not only decrease traffic jams but also limit greenhouse gases contributing to environmental pollution. Moreover, it seems that imposing the higher fuel prices can hardly affect people's behaviors, but education can. It should be noted that rasing citizens' awareness about environmental protection is a better way than increasing fuel prices to address global pollution as they will tend to use public transportation such as buses and coaches instead of private cars.

Students: We have free audio pronunciation exercises.

Furthermore, there are many alternative solutions that are more effective than increasing fuel prices. To cope with traffic congestion better, people, for example, are able to implement First, governments can provide grants for research into manufacturing driverless [ 1] electric cars that have the capacity to can safely find the best road route without being stuck in crowded places. In comparison with human s' ability to drivers, automatic cars will help not only decrease traffic jams but also limit greenhouse gases contributing to environmental and reduce pollution. Moreover, it seems that imposing the higher fuel prices can hardly affect people's behaviors, but education can . It should be noted that raise ing citizens' awareness about environmental protection is a better way than increasing fuel prices to address global pollution as they will tend and the need to make greater use of public transportation such as buses and trains and coaches instead of private cars.

-----------------------------------------------------------

[ 1]: Driverless cars also cause pollution. You need to think carefully about what you want to say.

This is my conclusion for this essay!
Many thank to Teechr!

________________________________________

In conclusion, I do not agree that the introduction of higher fuel prices will help reduce traffic jams and environmental pollution. It does not work as expected as possible, while there are more effective solutions such as research into driverless electronic cars and education about protecting the environment.

This is my conclusion for this essay!

Many thanks to Teechr!

_____________________________________

In conclusion, I do not agree that the introduction of higher fuel prices will help not reduce traffic jams and environmental pollution, because most people rely on private cars and have no viable alternative. However, It does not work as expected as possible, while there are more effective solutions to that problem, such as research into driverless [ 1] electronic electric cars and education about protecting the environment.

--------------------------------------------------

[ 1]: “electronic” is used to describe small instruments and gadgets, such as mobile phones, watches, etc.

Teachers: We supply a list of EFL job vacancies

Thanks Teechr!

You're welcome. As I said, do not try to complicate your sentences. Keep practising. You're making good progress.