please check the following sentences are right. Thank you.
1. The USA comprises of 50 states.
2. The USA is comprised of 50 states.
3. The USA comprises 50 states. -----------I think, this has a different meaning from (1).
4. The committee is comprised of 8 members.
1. The USA comprises of 50 states.
2. The USA is comprised of 50 states.
3. The USA comprises 50 states. -----------I think, this has a different meaning from (1).
4. The committee is comprised of 8 members.
1 2
Comments
please check the following sentences are right. Thank you.
1. The USA comprises
of50 states. No.2. The USA is comprised of 50 states. Yes.
3. The USA comprises 50 states. -----------I think, this has a different meaning from (1). No, it doesn't.
4. The committee is comprised of 8 members. Yes.
Best wishes, Clive
'The USA compreses 50 states' is the same as 'The USA is comprised of 50 states '?
I was listening to a radio program which teaches English last night, and the host said that 'The USA is comprised of 50 states' is wrong. You American don't use a passive pattern in this case. Don't you?
You're welcome.
Perhaps I'd better let an American answer that.
Clive
—Usage note Comprise has had an interesting history of sense development. In addition to its original senses, dating from the 15th century, “to include” and “to consist of
And this is from Bartleby.com:
If you follow the traditional rule, you say that the whole comprises the parts and that the parts compose the whole. Thus you would say The Union comprises fifty states and Fifty states compose (or constitute or make up) the Union. While writers often maintain this distinction, comprise is increasingly used in place of compose, especially in the passive: The Union is comprised of fifty states. Don’t be surprised if this usage still elicits comments, however. In an earlier survey, a majority of the Usage Panel found this use of comprise unacceptable.
Sohere are still people like me know that "The commmittee comprises 8 people" is fine and don't object to "Eight people comprise the committee" but don't like "the committee is comprised of 8 people." Go figure.
See the dictionary definition:
Verb
- S: (v) consist , comprise (be composed of) "The land he conquered comprised several provinces"; "What does this dish consist of?"
- S: (v) incorporate , contain , comprise (include or contain; have as a component) "A totally new idea is comprised in this paper"; "The record contains many old songs from the 1930's"
- S: (v) constitute , represent , make up , comprise, be (form or compose) "This money is my only income"; "The stone wall was the backdrop for the performance"; "These constitute my entire belonging"; "The children made up the chorus"; "This sum represents my entire income for a year"; "These few men comprise his entire army"
That being said, there is apparently a large percentage of the world's English-speaking population that insists on using this incorrectly, i.e. "comprised of," as in No. 2 and No. 4 above. It appears that the incorrect usage has become common vernacular, but it is still wrong -- since "comprise" means "to be composed of," saying "comprised of" is like saying "The commitee is composed of of 8 members." That is simply bad grammar. No. 3 is the correct usage.I enjoyed reading your comment.
Let me just quote from my Canadian Oxford Paperback Dictionary on usage.
Such usages as The panel is comprised of five individuals . . . are strongly opposed by some . . . . The disputed uses are very common, however, and considered unobjectionable by many.
Apparently, you are part of the 'some' and I am part of the 'many'.
Best wishes, Clive