In recent decades, there has been a great trend toward travelling to remote natural areas for a variety of purposes. Although this trend might be of great concern for some environmental activists, scientists and thrill-seekers should be encouraged to research remote environment.

There are a variety of reasons why scientists should travel to remote areas to study and protect. First, by physically travelling to remote areas, scientists are able to scrutinize and discover more about the Earth. This benefits not only citizens but also governments as there will be more solutions to take action on global issues, such as climate change and environmental degradation. Second, since humans are not able to tackle global warming by their knowledge, scientists should find more data about climate change to announce to citizens. In fact, if no pertinent environmental data is collected, even innocent people can do harm to the environment.

There are also a number of benefits for tourists travelling to remote areas. One of those benefits is that they can immerse themselves in the natural environment. In fact, when travelling to remote areas, they can take off the pressure as the atmosphere is fantastic. In addition, travelling to remote areas can promote environmental awareness. In fact, some visitors decide to become environmental advocates or even activists after experienced the trip to remote areas.

In conclusion, scientists and tourists should travel to remote areas to gain more knowledge and raise awareness about environmental protection.

Please do not put the essay instructions in the "Subject" line.
Put it with your answer in the message body.

Also, please copy the topic correctly.

Subject: Please review my IELTS essay

Message body:
Topic: : It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, (Strange usage. Unnatural) such as the South Pole. (I have never heard of tourists going to the south pole.) Do you agree or disagree with this development? (That is a very strange question. Maybe they mean "do you think this is a good or a bad thing? I wonder if this topic was actually written by a native speaker. )

My essay:

(Your text here...)
---------------------

You wrote less than the minimum, which is 250 words. Your score will be decreased.



In recent decades, there has been a great trend toward travelling to remote natural areas for a variety of purposes. Although this trend might be of great concern for some environmental activists, scientists and thrill-seekers should be encouraged to visit and explore these previously-inaccessible places. to research remote environment. (That is unnatural English)

There are a variety of reasons why scientists should travel to remote areas to study and protect. (That is not good grammatically. ) First, by physically travelling to remote areas, scientists are able to gather samples of rocks and vegetation to study scrutinize and discover more about the Earth. This benefits not only citizens but also governments as there will be more solutions to take action on global issues, such as climate change and environmental degradation. Second, since we humans (Use "humans" to compare with other life forms such as animals or artificial intelligence.) are not able to tackle global warming given the current state of knowledge by their knowledge, (I do not understand this) scientists should collect find more data about climate change to make new models of future climates. announce to citizens. In fact, if no pertinent environmental data is collected, even innocent people can do harm to the environment.

There are also a number of benefits for tourists travelling to remote areas. One of those benefits is that they can immerse themselves in the natural environment. In fact, when travelling to remote areas, they can take off the pressure as the atmosphere is fantastic. (I do not understand this.) In addition, travelling to remote areas can promote environmental awareness. In fact, some visitors decide to become environmental advocates or even activists after experienced the experiencing a trip to a remote areas.

In conclusion, scientists and tourists should travel to remote areas to gain more knowledge and raise awareness about environmental protection.