For me to go to London would be an interesting experience.
To put a spider on my desk is a mean thing to do.
In formal writing, is it ever permissible to have a non-finite clause such as these?
I also don't understand why a non-finite clause can be called a 'clause' when they sometimes don't have a subject (and no finite verb)... Why can they have no subject? How are these different from phrases?
In formal writing, is it ever permissible to have a non-finite clause such as these?Yes, of course. Formal writing is full of non-finite clauses.
I also don't understand why a non-finite clause can be called a 'clause' when they sometimes don't have a subjectThe verb is usually the most important part. The subject is usually implied by the rest of the sentence or by the larger context.
For me to go to London
The subject is me. (The subject is in the objective case in for ... to ... clauses.)
To put a spider on my desk
The subject is 'null'. anyone or any person is implied: For anyone to put a spider on my desk
Looking for ESL work?: Try our EFL / TOEFL / ESL Jobs Section!
what I mean is, can it stand as a sentence on its own?
Or is it a dependent clause and a finite clause is a indepndent clause?
No. Non-finite clauses can't stand alone as independent clauses.
Haven't we been through this before?
Eddie88made me think otherwiseAh. Probably because I snipped out a piece of each sentence and did the analysis of it separately from the whole sentence.
People are waiting to help.
Related forum topics: