I read that the word 'dissimilar' is frequently used with the particle 'not', isn't it? When I came across a couple of sentences with this word I discovered that the construction looks rather strange to me. For example, can I rephrase the sentence - This house is not dissimilar to the one I was born in - as follows - This house looks like the one I was born in - or should I say: This house doesn't look like the one I was born in?
I think that the first rephrased sentence is correct.
I'm sorry for placing this thread in this forum. I wanted to place it in "General English grammar questions" but mixed up the names.
I think that the first rephrased sentence is correct.
I'm sorry for placing this thread in this forum. I wanted to place it in "General English grammar questions" but mixed up the names.
Comments
like;
no less than 100 answers = 100 answers or more
Whenever someone says something convoluted like "not dissimilar" when the simpler "similar" would do, we need to ask - Why the complication?
The reason is to avoid saying that it's similar. It's as if the writer wants to be indirect. He doesn't want others to come back to him later and accuse him of saying the houses are similar. "No, no, I never said they were similar!" he can say. The result of all this subtlety is that usually "not dis-X" means "somewhat X", an attenuated form of "X". At least this is not infrequently (i.e., somewhat frequently) what the structure connotes.
In my experience, Americans (because they are so direct and unsubtle when expressing themselves?) don't use this structure very often. Maybe others have observed the same thing.
CJ
Its pattern is not dissimilar to that seen -- not and dissimilar can be used together...? I would like someones advice on those two as well.
If you read this thread, you will find your answer.
Clive
Hello Califjim
I think your explanation is good.
I wanna make sure I have understood it correctly.
Not dissimilar means similar.
Why?