I found that "outside of" can mean beyond the boundaries of but I think "outside" can function in that sense as well.
What do you think?
Thanks for your time in advance.
Looking for ESL work?: Try our EFL / TOEFL / ESL Jobs Section!
"Outside" is most often used to describe not being in a building. "Outside of" is often used for a particular location.
Outside (noun) We painted the outside, leaving the inside until tomorrow.
Outside (averb) We had the picnic outside instead of indoors.
Outside (preposition) I saw the fire outside the window. [no of here].
Outside (adjective) The outside lock had been broken by the burglars.
Many people use the word as a preposition but still add of, which hurts my ears. It's somewhat tricky, I guess: just remember that if you are using the word as a preposition, with an object of the preposition, no other preposition [of] is necessary.
Does it apply to "inside vs. inside of" as well?
Does that apply to "inside vs. inside of" as well?
FakakiThanks so much for your answer.Does that apply to "inside vs. inside of" as well?Sincerely,TonyYes.
FakakiAre outside and outside of interchangeable?For some people. The "outside of" wording is wordy http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/wordy and unnecessary.
People are waiting to help.
Related forum topics: