Hi everybody!

I have a question as folows:

Can you explain me about the differential of plural of photo: photos or photoes

when i search in the Internet about plural of photo: there are lot of "photos" and "photoes" to be found.

Best Regards!

Mai Duc Thong
1 2
Hi,

Only photos is correct.

There is a lot of incorrect English on the internet.Emotion: crying

Clive
Hi,

Clive is right.
However, I think it's ok to use photoes if u say/chat/email a friend in a casual way
Site Hint: Check out our list of pronunciation videos.
Hi,

But why would you want to add an 'e'? What do you gain?

Clive
First of all thank you so much guys.

Yes, I only think "photos" is correct

Best regards.
Hi,

I don't do but some odd guys do.

Look fun. I think.
Students: Are you brave enough to let our tutors analyse your pronunciation?
Hi,

Or do you mean looke fune?Emotion: smile

Clive
The reaon one would add the "e" would be to differentiate it in cadence: if someone's name was "Photos" it would be phonotactically usual for an English-speaker to pronounce it "foe-toss." Dictionaries state that there is no "e", yet, it is a perfectly sensible application of existing English spelling dynamics. I understand that "photo's" is the original form, and that the apostrophe that indicated the absence of "-graph" erroded at some stage. So "photos" is the abbreviated form of "photographs", yet, "photoes" could be the plural form of "photo" if "photo" was a word in its own right. The two wordsdescribe the same thing, yet, the words themselves arrive from different routes. I think that the only reason that "photos" has prevailed is because dictionaries asserted this early on; I would consider it a suppressed variant, rather than a common misspelling.
I like the fune
Teachers: We supply a list of EFL job vacancies
Show more