Topic:

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.


Answer:

People often claim that money donation from developed countries does not have effective effects on reducing poverty in indigent nations, in fact, they believe other attributes could be more workable than financial supports. However, I am inclined to believe that underdeveloped countries could be beneficial from both money and non-financial subsidies.

In terms of financial aid, a variety of functions in governmental bodies would be positively carried out by the intervention from wealthy countries. Firstly, public education systems will be enhanced the facilities and teaching methods that help children be more able to understand lessons effectively. Furthermore, infrastructure including transportation, sewage treatment, for instance, would be advantageous from the external monetary flow.

On the other hand, since money is not always the most efficient solution for indigent countries, proponents of other forms of subsidies that would be more valuable. In fact, less developed nations will not as strategic and experienced, which emphasises the need for direction and consultancy from experienced organisations. Furthermore, even if financially supported, they still need proper guidance by experts in various fields such as medical, engineering. However, those professions can only be trained by an advanced educational system and hence it would be more practical and suitable to provide proper training programs for the sake of long term development.

In conclusion, while I accept that financial aid would be supportive in poor and developing nations, I believe that global help should come into more practical assistance according to the current needs of the country.

People often claim that money donation (wrong word) from developed countries does not have effective effects on reducing poverty in indigent (wrong word) nations, (comma splice error) in fact, they believe other attributes (wrong word) could be more workable than financial supports. (wrong form) However, I am inclined to believe that underdeveloped countries could be beneficial (wrong word) from both money and non-financial subsidies.


Corrected version:

People often claim that money donated by developed countries does not have any effect on reducing poverty in poor nations. In fact, they believe other types of aid are much better than financial support. However, I am inclined to believe that underdeveloped countries could be benefited by both money and non-financial subsidies.



In terms of financial aid, a variety of functions in governmental bodies would be positively impacted carried out by the intervention from wealthy countries. Firstly, First. public education systems will be improved by introducing modern enhanced the facilities and teaching methods that help children be more able to better understand their lessons effectively. Furthermore, infrastructure including transportation, sewage treatment, (ungrammatical sequence) for instance, would reduce disease, add jobs and jump.-start the economy. be advantageous from the external monetary flow.


On the other hand, since money is not always the most efficient solution for indigent countries, proponents of other forms of subsidies that would be more valuable. (incomplete sentence) In fact, less developed nations will not as strategic and experienced, (incomplete main clause) which emphasises the need for direction and consultancy from experienced organisations. Furthermore, even if financially supported, they still need proper guidance by experts in various fields such as medical, engineering. (ungrammatical sequence) However, those professions (wrong word) can only be trained by an advanced educational system and hence it would be more practical and suitable to provide proper training programs for the sake of long term development.


In conclusion, while I accept that financial aid would be supportive in poor and developing nations, I believe that global help should come into provide more practical assistance according to the current needs of the country.