+0

Topic: some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternatives sources. discuss both views and give your own opinion

Nowadays, the question of whether creative artists should be supported by state budgets or other alternative sources has been receiving a great deal of attention. While some people disagree with the idea of government should support creative artists, I believe that money for art projects should come from both government and other sources.

There are some compelling reasons why governments should give financial support to some art projects. First, since some kinds of art represent national identity, governments should encourage to develop these kinds of arts. In fact, there are myriad works of art place in public spaces, such as streets, museums, and other squares in city centres, thus local people could enjoy and study about their national culture and history from these works of art. Second, by attracting visitors and tourists from works of art, such as statues, sculptures and monuments, government aslo earn revenues from tourism. Eiffel tower in Paris, Liberty Enlightening the World in Newyork are great examples, they attract thousands of people all around the world each year, which results in boosting the host economic well-being.

On the other hand, there are also some reasons why some art projects should be funded by other alternative sources rather than national budgets. First, since government have more vital concerns rather than works of art, national budgets should be used to address these. Infact, governments should spent money on key fields, such as education, healthcare, infrastructures and security, which could improve quality of social life. Second, there are thousands of people who love enjoying works of art, thus they should contribute to creative artists creating these art project. For example, the art lovers could pay fee, donate or buy artists's works, which lead to the artist could boost individual economic in order to develop their talents.

In conclusion, in my opinion, both governments and other alternatives should contribute to artists.

+0

Nowadays, the question of whether creative artists should be supported by state budgets or other alternative sources has been receiving a great deal of attention. (Do not use memorized phrases in an IELTS essay. It is not good.) While some people disagree with the idea of government should support creative artists, (ungrammatical. Do not put a full clause as the object of a preposition.) I believe that money for art projects should come from both government and other sources.

There are some compelling reasons why governments should give financial support to some art projects. First, since some kinds of art represent national identity, governments should encourage artists to develop (wrong word) these kinds of arts. In fact, there are myriad (wrong word, wrong usage) works of art place (wrong form) in public spaces, (wrong punctuation - no comma) such as streets, museums, and other squares in city centres, thus local people could enjoy and learn study about their national culture and history from these works of art. Second, by attracting visitors and tourists from (wrong word) works of art, (wrong punctuation - no comma) such as statues, sculptures and monuments, government aslo earn revenues from tourism. The Eiffel Tower in Paris, (wrong punctuation - no comma) and Liberty Enlightening the World in Newyork are great examples, (wrong punctuation, comma splice error, ungrammatical) they attract thousands of people all around the world each year, which results in boosting the host economic well-being. (wrong punctuation - no comma)

On the other hand, there are also some reasons why some art projects should be funded by other alternative sources rather than national budgets. First, since governments have more vital concerns rather than works of art, national budgets should be used to address these. Infact, governments should spent money on key areas fields, (wrong word) such as education, healthcare, infrastructures (wrong form) and security, which could improve the quality of social life. Second, there are thousands of people who love enjoying works of art, (wrong punctuation, comma splice error, ungrammatical) thus they should contribute to creative artists creating these art project. (wrong form) For example, the art lovers could pay fee, (wrong form) donate money or buy artists's works, which lead to the artist could boost (ungrammatical. Do not put a full clause as the object of a preposition.) individual economic (wrong word) in order to develop their talents.

In conclusion, in my opinion, both governments and other alternatives (wrong usage) should contribute to artists.

Comments  
Teachers: We supply a list of EFL job vacancies

Hello. Can you check my answers in this question, please?

https://www.englishforums.com/English/CheckMyAnswersItsEasy/bpcbvv/post.htm

thanks so much

In a bid to support artists, government have to sponsor them. However, the other section of society believe that this area could be funded by other sources. In my opinion, government had better spend money in other areas that are more essential.

On the one hand,few people think that creative artists such as painters and musicians could be funded by government. To be more precise, some artists are completely depend on their skills because it is only earning source for them but if they want to become a genius in particular skill then they need to invest money, time and energy in it and if they do not have any savings then they are unable to polish that talent. In addition to this , sometime artists are stressed because nobody recognize their talent and they hide their skills. They never gather audience by ownself. Therefore, it is a authorities responsibility that they provide sufficient help to artists.

On the other hand,some people are against this notion, they believe that they are various sources which are proved helpful for artists. Masses say that government spend money in those sectors where they have needed. For example, in education system,medical as well as in agriculture stream because these areas are necessary for humanity. Hence, artists can earn money by ownself by selling their paintings or songs.

In conclusion, in my opinion, eventhough artistic skills plays an key role in society and it is a government duty that they give them help to improve this sector. However, there are manifold sources who provide financial help to motivate artists such as talent shows.

Students: We have free audio pronunciation exercises.
ROBINPREETIn a bid to support artists,

Do not add your essay to someone else's old thread.