Task 2: In today’s world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters, and writers. What can the arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
There is no doubt that the advancement of science and technology has been transforming our lives in countless ways. However, this sector still has limitations in some aspects including arts. Since arts provide humans with profound experiences that science and technology cannot replicate
It is evident that science and technology are often limited in interpreting the value and beliefs in our society. In fact, through modern technological gadgets such as the internet, smartphone, etc we are likely to keep abreast with many things surrounding us, but we would be unable to have a profound understanding of each social issue. For instance, we could find out that the mona lisa is a masterpiece of Leonardo da Vinci through the internet but we could explore the inner meaning of this picture if we have a lack of knowledge in literature. Besides, science and technology are less likely to provide enough insight into the diversity of human emotions. Although these sectors might help us to perceive biological and physical responses in humans, they provide insufficient insight into the emotional and social dynamics that shape our interactions with others.
Otherwise, art could teach us the beauty of culture and enhance our perspectives in social norms and values. To illustrate, hundreds of literary works instill in people many historical experiences with various social phenomena as a way to spur people not only understand their identities in general communities but also respect their value of culture, belief and norms. Moreover, numerous pieces of arts, songs and literary works could depict human’s experience in emotion including love, happiness, sorrow, misfortune, which enhance one’s motivation in lives and make them appreciate their existence.
In conclusion, while science and technology drive logical thinking in many aspects of life, art can convey more profound perspectives regarding human experience in understanding life. Hence, there is no doubt that people are specialized in fields of art have a vital role in bring truly value and worthy contribution for our society.
There is no doubt that the advancement of (Not a good subject for this sentence.) science and technology has been transforming our lives in countless ways. However, this sector still has they have their limitations in some aspects including arts. (That is not sensible.) Since The arts provide us humans with profound experiences that science and technology cannot. replicate
It is evident that (Avoid these "dummy-it" clauses. They weaken your statement.) Science and technology are often limited in their ability to express interpreting the value and beliefs in our society. In fact, through modern technology cal gadgets (The internet is not a gadget. smartphone is not a gadget.) such as the internet, smartphone, etc (Do not use "etc." is academic essays. Do not use "..." either.) we are likely to keep abreast with many events / happenings things surrounding us, but we would be unable to have a profound understanding of each social issue. For instance, we could find out that the mona lisa (That is a proper noun.) is a masterpiece of Leonardo da Vinci through the internet but we could explore the inner meaning of this picture if we have a lack of knowledge in literature. (I do not understand what you mean. Literature is great writing, not painting.) Besides, science and technology are less likely to provide any enough insight into the diversity of human emotions. Although these sectors (wrong phrase - Sector is not the correct word.) might help us to perceive biological and physical responses in humans, they provide insufficient insight into the emotional and social dynamics that shape our interactions with others.
Otherwise, the arts could teach us the beauty of culture and enhance expand our perspectives in social norms and values. To illustrate this, hundreds of literary works describe historical events and their impact on our current situation, so we have a better understanding of our nation and its diplomatic relationships with neighboring countries. instill in people many historical experiences with various social phenomena (wrong word - this sentence is a lot of fancy words, but the meaning is quite opaque. ) as a way to spur It helps people not only understand their identities in general communities but also respect their value of culture, belief and norms in contrast with others. Moreover, numerous pieces of art works, arts, songs and literary works could depict human’s experience in emotion (unnatural) emotions including love, happiness, sorrow, misfortune, (ungrammatical. Missing conjunction) which enhance one’s motivation in lives motivates us and make them us appreciate our their existence.
In conclusion, while science and technology drive logical thinking in many aspects of life, art can convey more profound perspectives regarding human experience in understanding life. Hence, there is no doubt that people are specialized in fields of art have a vital role (ungrammatical. There is no subject for the verb "have") in bring (wrong verb form) truly (wrong word. Truly is an adverb. Adverbs do not modify nouns.) value and worthy contribution (wrong form) for to our society.
Undoubtedly, the relentless progress of science and technology has undeniably revolutionized various facets of our existence. Nevertheless, it is imperative to acknowledge that this domain possesses inherent limitations, particularly within the realm of arts. The arts bestow upon humanity profound experiences that elude replication by the forces of science and technology.
anonymousUndoubtedly, the relentless progress of science and technology has undeniably revolutionized various facets of our existence. Nevertheless, it is imperative to acknowledge that this domain possesses inherent limitations, particularly within the realm of arts. The arts bestow upon humanity profound experiences that elude replication by the forces of science and technology.
Are you vannguyen2007?
Well, you are trying very very hard to impress the examiner with "sophisticated" vocabulary and "erudite" phrases. It will backfire. You will not get a good score for this style of writing. It is forced and unnatural.
Students misunderstand Task 2.
It is not a vocabulary test. It is not an English test.
It is a communications test. How clearly and effectively can you convince a reader that your position is well explained and supported.