People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.

It is widely believed that raising the cost of fuel is one solution from the government to address the environmental issues. Personally, I disagree with the this measure because I believe that other factors are equally important

On the one hand, increasing the price of fuel brings some benefits. Firstly, it can help reduce the environmental pollution to some degree. In other words, the excessive use of private cars which releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere would be limited so encourage the utilization of public transports. Therefore, this measure would cut down on emissions from vehicles to impede the process of global warming and reduce the greenhouse effect. Secondly, the citizens are forced to lead greener life if the cost of fuel increase. It means that they have greater sense of saving energy in household activities such as air conditioning, heating, cooking and so on as well as in manufacturing operations by applying more environmentally friendly technology.

Nevertheless, I believe that higher cost of fuel, higher cost of production because the production lines are primarily depends on machines powered by fuel. For this reason, the inhabitants, especially ones living in poverty-stricken countries may struggle with more expensive goods. As a result, if the cost of fuel increase, it may fairly impact on some fields related such as mechanical industry, logistics and the general price of the market. Moreover, raising the cost of fuel are unable to exhaustively solve the world’s environmental problems as the world’s population keep climbing rapidly. Therefore, the government should invest more in renewable energy sources such as wind, solar rather than non-renewable resources like coal or fuel.

In conclusion, while increasing cost of fuel brings some positive effects; however this measure still exist some drawbacks that should not be overlooked.

People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.

It is widely believed that raising the cost of fuel is one solution from the government to address the environmental issues. Personally, I disagree with the this measure because I believe that other factors are equally important

On the one hand, increasing the price of fuel brings some benefits. Firstly, it can help reduce the environmental pollution to some degree. In other words, the excessive use of private cars which releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere would be limited so encourage the utilization of public transports. Therefore, this measure would cut down on emissions from vehicles to impede the process of global warming and reduce the greenhouse effect. Secondly, the citizens are forced to lead greener life if the cost of fuel increase. It means that they have greater sense of saving energy in household activities such as air conditioning, heating, cooking and so on as well as in manufacturing operations by applying more environmentally friendly technology.

Nevertheless, I believe that higher cost of fuel, higher cost of production because the production lines are primarily depends on machines powered by fuel. For this reason, the inhabitants, especially ones living in poverty-stricken countries may struggle with more expensive goods. As a result, if the cost of fuel increase, it may fairly impact on some fields related such as mechanical industry, logistics and the general price of the market. Moreover, raising the cost of fuel are unable to exhaustively solve the world’s environmental problems as the world’s population keep climbing rapidly. Therefore, the government should invest more in renewable energy sources such as wind, solar rather than non-renewable resources like coal or fuel.

In conclusion, while increasing cost of fuel brings some positive effects; however this measure still exist some drawbacks that should not be overlooked.

It is widely believed that raising the cost of fuel is one solution from the government to address the environmental issues. Personally, I disagree with the this measure because I believe that other factors are equally important (missing punctuation)

On the one hand, increasing the price of fuel brings some benefits. Firstly, First,, it can help reduce the air environmental pollution to some degree. In other words, the excessive use of private cars, which releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, would be limited more expensive and that would so encourage people to take the utilization of public transportation transports. Therefore, this measure would cut down on emissions from vehicles to and impede the process of global warming by reducing and reduce the greenhouse gasses effect. (The greenhouse effect is a property of certain gasses to act like a blanket when they are present in the atmosphere. The effect itself is a fixed property and cannot be reduced. The amount of gasses can be reduced.) Secondly, Second, the citizens are forced to lead a more ecologically-friendly lifestyle greener life if the cost of fuel increases. It means that they have a greater sense of saving energy in household activities such as air conditioning, heating and cooking. and so on as well as in Manufacturing operations will also install by applying more environmentally friendly technology.

Nevertheless, I believe that higher cost of fuel, higher cost of production (That is not grammatically correct) the higher fuel costs will cause production costs to rise, because the production lines are primarily depends (wrong verb form) on machines powered by fuel. For this reason, people the inhabitants, especially ones living in poverty-stricken countries may struggle to pay for with more expensive goods. As a result, if the cost of fuel increase, (wrong verb form) it may fairly impact on some fields related such as mechanical affect industry, logistics and the general price of all goods and services. the market. Moreover, raising the cost of fuel are (wrong verb form) unable to exhaustively solve all the world’s environmental problems as the world’s population keep (wrong verb form) climbing rapidly. Therefore, the government should invest more in renewable energy sources such as wind, and solar rather than non-renewable resources like coal or petroleum. fuel.

In conclusion, while increasing the cost of fuel brings some positive effects, ; however this measure still exist entails / has some drawbacks that should not be overlooked.

Students: We have free audio pronunciation exercises.

Thank you so much for your help❤️