Prompt: Some people think that typical teaching of a teacher and students in the class will not exist by the year 2050. Do you agree or disagree?


Have you ever wondered how the teaching method will be changed in the next 50 years? Up till now, education has attracted many considerable interested in the general public. To raise up an educational quality, authorities have looked for the new techniques to alternate outdated ways. To the best of my knowledge, the traditional teaching methods consist of teacher and children in the class will be continued, although the benefits of a new teaching method are incontrovertible.


The first reason is that the teachers play a role not only impart knowledge but also educate morality for students. While the parents who have a lot of time to communicate with their children at home, the teachers will interact with children in the rest of the time at school. Therefore, teachers play an important role to design and nurture behavior and righteousness of students especially young children. As an old saying: "a talented man without virtue is useless" indicated people should be learned both of them to become a complete person. To short, people have to keep the teachers in class to balance between knowledge and moral.


Another reason to keep the teacher and students in class is that the teachers who conduct and accommodate the knowledge for students. Indeed, in modern life, people are framed by the amount of information involve bad and cheap knowledge. Because of this, students need to have a guider to instruct the appropriate ways to approach education. It cannot envision when students study incorrect chemical theory, for example, the safe ways to use acid in experiments. Not only does it injure students physically but also it expires students' consciousness. Thus, teachers are so-called guiders need to exist in the future class.


In conclusion, the traditional class including teacher and students should be kept by the year 2050 and after. These will support for education for both of sides: morality education and knowledge instruction. In my personal view, there are combine between traditional and new methods in teaching to improve the education environment.



Have you ever wondered how the teaching method (There is more than one method of teaching.) will be changed will change in the next 50 years? Up till now, education has attracted many considerable interested in the general public. (This makes no sense. It is not a good sentence. ) To raise up an educational quality, (incorrect phrase. "the quality of education") authorities (wrong word. "educators") have looked for the new techniques to alternate (wrong word. "replace / improve ") outdated ways. To the best of my knowledge, the traditional teaching methods consist (wrong form - "consisting" ) of teacher and children in the classroom will be continued, although the benefits of a new teaching method are incontrovertible. (You did not answer the prompt: Do you agree or disagree? It does not ask about your knowledge, or what you know, but what you believe about it.)


The first reason is that the teachers play a role not only (missing word) impart knowledge but also educate morality (Is "morality" the name of a student?) for students. While the parents who have a lot of time to communicate with (not a good phrase to use) their children at home, the teachers will interact with children in the rest of the time at school. Therefore, teachers play an important role to design (not a good word choice) and nurture behavior and righteousness (not a good word choice) of students especially young children. As an old saying: "a talented man without virtue is useless" indicated people should be learned (wrong verb phrase. We do not learn people; we learn lessons) ) both of them to become a complete person. To short, people have to keep the teachers in class to balance between knowledge and moral. (Moral is an adjective. wrong usage)


Another reason to keep the teacher and students in class (Is there any other option? What is it?) is that the teachers who conduct and accommodate (wrong word) the knowledge for students. (Fragment) Indeed, in modern life, people are framed (wrong word - to frame means to wrongly accuse of a crime) ) by the amount of information involve bad and cheap knowledge. (wrong phrasing. poor word choice) Because of this, students need to have a guider to instruct the appropriate ways to approach education. It (??) cannot envision when students study incorrect chemical theory, for example, the safe ways to use acid (Is "safe ways" incorrect?) in experiments. Not only does it injure students physically but also it expires students' consciousness. (wrong usage) Thus, teachers are so-called guiders (missing words) need to exist in the future class.


In conclusion, the traditional class including teacher and students should be kept by the year 2050 and after. These will support for education for both of sides: morality education and knowledge instruction. In my personal view, there are combine between traditional and new methods in teaching to improve the education environment.

Firstly, I apologize because of late respond.

My fixed essay below:

Have you ever wondered how teaching method will change in the next 50 years? Up till now, education has got a high weight in societies. To raise the quality of education, educators have looked for the new techniques to replace outdated ways. To the best of my knowledge, I believe that the traditional teaching methods consisting of teacher and children in the classroom will be continued, although the benefits of a new teaching method are incontrovertible.


The first reason is that the teachers play a role not only imparting knowledge but also educating morals for students. While the parents who have a lot of time to connect with their children at home, the teachers will interact with children at school. Therefore, teachers play an important role to create and nurture behavior and righteousness of students especially young children. As an old saying: "a talented man without virtue is useless" indicated people should learn both of them to become a complete person. To short, people have to keep the teachers in class to balance between knowledge and morality.


Another reason to keep existence of the teacher and students in classroom is that the teachers conduct and pass the knowledge into students. Indeed, in modern life, people are surrounded by the amount of information with misguided knowledge. Because of this, students need to have a guide to approach the valid ways of education. People cannot envision when students study incorrect chemical theory, for example, the inaccurate ways to use acid in experiments. Not only does it injure students physically but also it destroys students' consciousness on the chemical knowledge. Thus, teachers are so-called as guides need to exist in the future class.


In conclusion, the traditional class including teacher and students should be kept by the year 2050 and after. These will support for education for both of sides: morality education and knowledge instruction. In my personal view, there are traditional and new methods combine in teaching to improve the education environment.

---

Students: Are you brave enough to let our tutors analyse your pronunciation?
quocthinh95Firstly, First, I apologize because of the late response.

It's OK. L ate is better than never.

Have you ever wondered how teaching methods (We use many methods today. I don't expect that to change.) will change in the next 50 years? Up till now, education has been highly valued got a high weight in societies. (Do you mean education is not valued now?) To raise the quality of education, educators have looked for the new techniques to replace outdated ways. To the best of my knowledge, I believe that the traditional teaching methods consisting of teacher and children in the classroom will be continued, although the benefits of a new teaching method are incontrovertible. (You never described any "new teaching" method. What is it? What are the benefits?)


The first reason is that the teachers play a role in not only imparting knowledge but also moral values. educating morals for students. While the parents who have a lot of time to instruct connect with their children at home, the teachers will interact with children at school. Therefore, teachers play an important role to encourage create and nurture good behavior and righteousness of students especially in young children. As an old saying goes: "a talented man without virtue is useless." indicated It means that people should learn both talents and virtue of them to become a complete person. To short, people have to keep the teachers in class to balance between knowledge and morality.


Another reason to keep existence of the teacher and students in the classroom is that the teachers conduct and pass the knowledge on to into students. (Isn't this the same point as in your last paragraph?) Indeed, in modern life, people are surrounded by incorrect the amount of information with misguidedknowledge. Because of this, students need to have a guide to filter out misinformation. approach the valid ways of education. People cannot envision a time when students study incorrect procedures in chemistry chemical theory, for example, the unsafe inaccurate ways to use acid in experiments. Not only can does it injure students physically but also it (I have no idea what you mean. "it gives them false information about chemistry." ) destroys students' consciousness on the chemical knowledge. Thus, teachers are so-called as guides need to exist in the future classroom.


In conclusion, the traditional class including teacher and students should be kept by the year 2050 and after. These will support for education for both of sides: morality education and knowledge instruction. In my personal view, there are traditional and new methods that can be combined in teaching to improve the education system environment.

---

Have you ever wondered how teaching methods (We had many change in education in the past and it will continue in the future, so I have a reason to believe everyone have the same wonder.) will change in the next 50 years? Up till now, education has been highly valued got a high weight in societies. (I mean the education has attracted all of people in societies) To raise the quality of education, educators have looked for the new techniques to replace outdated ways. To the best of my knowledge, I believe that the traditional teaching methods consisting of teacher and children in the classroom will be continued, although the benefits of a new teaching method are incontrovertible. (Is it need to describe the new method in the introduction or in the body?)

---> In the Body and Conclusion, I got clear because of my wrong words. Thank you so much to correct my mistakes

quocthinh95(Is it necessary to describe the new method in the introduction or in the body?)

If you put it in your introduction, especially in your thesis statement, the reader expects you to give examples of this "new method" and its benefits in the body paragraphs.

Students: We have free audio pronunciation exercises.