Topic: Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?

Nobody can deny the growth of digital library resources. Some people argue that the development in technology as now can replace traditional library. I completely disagree this statement.

On the one hand, it is true that both conventional libraries and virtual ones have some same functions so virtual libraries can us as alternative. They have paved the way for access to a wide range of information. In addition, the development of computer science has brought more benefits for our life. Everyone can approach easily a great deal of information resources wherever they want instead of going to traditional libraries to search for them. Moreover, the information on the Internet regularly update which public libraries can not do that.

On the other hand, I still believe that public libraries have some functions that computer libraries can not take over. For example, traditional library is the best place that provide a great self-study zone with sound-proof rooms and fully-equipped materials for people especially students and undergraduates. They usually go to library to search more information for their thesis or sometimes they choose this to discuss with other team members to do homework. Besides, users have access to more reliable information. Nowadays, more and more online information that is publicized on the Internet can lead to a misinformed public whereas traditional libraries keep valuable materials.

In conclusion, I would argue that there are certain roles of public library that virtual library difficultly take over. I believe that it is not true when considering public library as waste of money.

Topic: Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?

Nobody can deny the growth of digital library resources. Some people argue that the development in technology as now can replace traditional library. I completely disagree this statement.

On the one hand, it is true that both conventional libraries and virtual ones have some same functions so virtual libraries can us as alternative. They have paved the way for access to a wide range of information. In addition, the development of computer science has brought more benefits for our life. Everyone can approach easily a great deal of information resources wherever they want instead of going to traditional libraries to search for them. Moreover, the information on the Internet regularly update which public libraries can not do that.

On the other hand, I still believe that public libraries have some functions that computer libraries can not take over. For example, traditional library is the best place that provide a great self-study zone with sound-proof rooms and fully-equipped materials for people especially students and undergraduates. They usually go to library to search more information for their thesis or sometimes they choose this to discuss with other team members to do homework. Besides, users have access to more reliable information. Nowadays, more and more online information that is publicized on the Internet can lead to a misinformed public whereas traditional libraries keep valuable materials.

In conclusion, I would argue that there are certain roles of public library that virtual library difficultly take over. I believe that it is not true when considering public library as waste of money.

Please do not double-post.

Students: Are you brave enough to let our tutors analyse your pronunciation?

Nobody can deny the growth of digital library on-line resources. Some people argue that the development in technology as now (Development of what? Not technology, as technology refers to hardware, smart cars, rocket ships, and other things that have no relationship to a library.) can replace the traditional library. I completely disagree (missing word) this statement.

On the one hand, it is true that both conventional libraries and virtual ones have some same functions so virtual libraries can us (wrong word, wrong form) as alternative. They have paved the way for access to a wide range of information. In addition, the development of computer science has brought more benefits for our life. (wrong form) Everyone can approach (wrong word) easily a great deal of information resources wherever they want instead of going to traditional libraries to search for them. Moreover, the information on the Internet regularly update (wrong form) which (wrong word) public libraries can not do that.

On the other hand, I still believe that public libraries have some functions that computer libraries can not take over. For example, a traditional library is the best place that provide (wrong form) a great self-study zone with sound-proof rooms and fully-equipped materials for people especially high school students and undergraduates. They usually go to library to search more information for their thesis or sometimes they go there choose this to discuss (missing word) with other team members (classmates) and to do homework. Besides, users have access to more reliable information. Nowadays, more and more online information that is publicized on the Internet can lead to a misinformed public whereas traditional libraries keep valuable (wrong word - trustworthy) materials.

In conclusion, I would argue that there are certain roles of public library that virtual library difficultly take over. I believe that it is not true when considering public library as waste of money. (wrong usage)

Thank you very much for your help, I do not use forum completely so I do not know how reply you. I fixed my first essay, please help me to review it.


Nobody can deny the growth of on-line resources. Some people argue that the development computer technology can replace the traditional library. I completely disagree with this statement.

On the one hand, it is true that both conventional libraries and virtual ones have some same functions so virtual libraries can use as alternative. They have paved the way for access to a wide range of information. In addition, the development of computer science has brought more benefits for our lives Everyone can get access easily a great deal of information resources wherever they want instead of going to traditional libraries to search for them. Moreover, the information on the Internet regularly be regularly updated, whereas public libraries can not do that.

On the other hand, I still believe that public libraries have some functions that computer libraries can not take over. For example, a traditional library is the best place that provides a great self-study zone with sound-proof rooms and fully-equipped materials for people especially high school students and undergraduates. They usually go to library to search more information for their thesis or sometimes they go there to discuss with other classmates and to do homework. Besides, users have access to more reliable information. Nowadays, more and more online information that is publicized on the Internet can lead to a misinformed public whereas traditional libraries keep materials.

In conclusion, I would argue that there are certain roles of public library that virtual library can not be performed I believe that it is not true when considering public library as waste of money.

It is easy to reply to a post. Click on the "comment" or "reply" link at the end of the entry.

Students: We have free audio pronunciation exercises.

oh, I see, thank you, do you have any recommend about my essay after fixing?

Nobody can deny the growth of online resources. Some people argue that the development sophisticated computer technology can replace the traditional library. I completely disagree with this statement.

On the one hand, it is true that both conventional libraries and virtual libraries have some of the same functions so virtual libraries can be used as an alternative. They have paved the way for access to a wide range of information. In addition, the development of computers and digital communication science has brought more benefits for our lives Everyone can easily get access easily to a great deal of information resources wherever they want instead of going to traditional libraries to search for them. Moreover, the information on the Internet is regularly be regularly updated regularly, whereas public libraries can not do that.


Vocabulary: access

Access can be used as a verb or a noun.

Everyone can easily access information online. (verb. "information" is the direct object))
Everyone can easily get access to information online. (noun The prepositional phrase "to information" is required )


On the other hand, I still believe that public libraries have some functions that computer libraries can not take over. For example, a traditional library is the best place that provides excellent places for great self-study zone with soundproof rooms and fully-equipped materials such as reference books and computers for people, especially high school students and undergraduates. They usually go to library to search for more information for their thesis or sometimes they go there to discuss their lessons with other classmates and to do homework. Besides, library users have access to more reliable information. Nowadays, more and more online information that is published publicized on the Internet can be erroneous and lead to a misinformed public whereas traditional libraries keep only materials that have passed editorial review for accuracy.

In conclusion, I would argue that there are certain roles of a public library that virtual library can not be performed by a virtual one. I believe that it is not true when considering that maintaining a public library is a waste of money.

thank you so much Emotion: smile

Teachers: We supply a list of EFL job vacancies