Task 2: Nowadays, many animal species are becoming extinct. Some people believe that countries and individuals must solve this problem, others believe that human beings are more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Many species of animal are currently on the brick of extinction. Although some people argue that the interests of human welfare should be a government priority, preventing the further loss of animal species is more urgent.

on the one hand, there are several reasons why human beings have to be high on list of priorities of every countries and individuals. Firstly, effects of poverty, famines and natural disasters across the world are shown on TV on a regular basic. Therefore, the struggle for a more egalitarian society must be pursued vigoriously. Additionly, many ongoing conflicts and wars are pushing millions of citizens to live in life-threatening condition, in order to provide everyone a decent life, governments of these countries have to end these wars. This means that the allocation of resources to defense budgets, such as about 750 billion dollars annually in US, could be used to preserve human life, instead of destroying it.

on the other hand, the protection of wild animals must be high on the agenda of every individual citizen and government. Firstly, endangered species in the red list are increasing every year, if wildlife extinction continues, then humans would face an ecological crisis which impacts on their own survival. For example, if the practice of whaling is not halted, the ecosystems of our oceans would be altered forever, which may affect fish stocks on which many communities depend for making a living. Secondly, protecting wild animals means protecting natural habitats in which they live, such as rainforests or wetlands. For instance, if habitat destruction is permitted, climate change would affect our capacity to product food to sustain the growing human population.

In conclusion, while welfare of humans is an imprortant issue which governments cannot ignore, urgent actions must be taken to save animal species from extinction.

Many species of animal (wrong form) are currently on the brick (wrong word) of extinction. Although some people argue that the interests of human welfare should be a government priority, I hold that preventing the further loss of animal species is more urgent. (The topic asked for your opinion. It is best to state it clearly.)

on the one hand, there are several reasons why people's well-being has human beings have to be high on the list of priorities of every countries (wrong form) and individuals. (wrong form) Firstly, First, the effects of poverty, famines and natural disasters across the world are shown on TV on a regular basic. (wrong word) Therefore, the struggle for a more egalitarian society must be pursued vigoriously. Additionly, many ongoing conflicts and wars are pushing millions of citizens to live in life-threatening condition, (wrong form, comma splice error) in order to provide everyone a decent life, governments of these countries have to end these wars. This means that the allocation of resources to defense budgets, such as about 750 billion dollars annually in US, could be used to preserve human life, instead of destroying it.

on the other hand, the protection of wild animals must be high on the agenda of every individual citizen and government. Firstly, First, the number of endangered species on in the red list is are increasing every year, ( comma splice error) if wildlife extinction continues, then humans would face an ecological crisis which impacts on their own survival. For example, if the practice of whaling is not halted, the ecosystems of our oceans would be altered forever, which may affect fish stocks on which many communities depend for making a living. Secondly, Second, protecting wild animals means protecting the natural habitats in which they live, such as rainforests or wetlands. For instance, if habitat destruction is permitted, climate change (It is not clear how habitat destruction relates to climate change. Please add some information about that.) it would affect our capacity to product (wrong word) enough food to sustain the growing human population.

In conclusion, while welfare of humans is an imprortant issue which governments cannot ignore, urgent actions must be taken to save animal species from extinction.

Thank you so much.

Teachers: We supply a list of EFL job vacancies

Sorry teacher. I fixed my sentence into " Additionally, since many ongoing conflicts and wars are pushing millions of citizens to live in life-threatening conditions, governments of these countries must end these wars to be able to provide a decent life for everyone. "

Do you think that it 's clear ?

LeManhHungDo you think that it 's clear ?

Excellent!

Thank teacher so much.

Students: We have free audio pronunciation exercises.