Some people believe that holding a major international sports event is beneficial to a country, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.


Some people feel that hosting a primary international sport can bring benefits to a country, whereas others think it only entails more disadvantages. My view is that the downsides of this are overshadowed by its benefits.

First, If a globally-concerned event takes place in a country, then there would be a tremendous number of tourists visiting the nation. And this is favorable for its economy. Seemingly, it is common to see that once such an event happens, the price for accommodating and other services will rise astronomically. In fact, in an important period like this, tourists are normally willing to pay at an outrageous price without much hesitation, which helps turn huge profits for the local tourist industry. In addition to this, if a country organizes the event successfully, it will create a positive image in foreign citizens’ views. As a result, more people would get to know about that country, and possibilities are they would travel to the country or even invest in it.

Conversely, with a large number of tourists coming in, the host nation might face the problem of pollution. One main reason is that there would be an enormous amount of garbage discarded by those tourists. And this, when combined with the lack of responsibilities, will imminently pollute the local environment. In fact, there is a number of tourist attractions around the world that are being polluted by irresponsible tourists, including Ha Long Bay.

In conclusion, opinions are divided into whether hosting a major global sports competition is beneficial to a country or not. I personally believe that although this might pose a threat of pollution, the benefits provided are more significant. This is because I think a country can protect its environment in such a special period of time by making the law about the environment more severe.

Some people feel that hosting a primary major international sporting event can bring benefits to a country, whereas others think it only entails more point to the disadvantages. My view is that the downsides of this are overshadowed by its the benefits.

First, there are clear economic benefits to hosting an international sports competition. If a globally-concerned event takes place in a country, then First, there would be a tremendous number of tourists visiting the country, nation, and this is favorable great for its economy. Seemingly, it is common to see that once such an event happens, During such events, the price for accommodating of accommodation, food, entertainment and other services will rise astronomically, as demand skyrockets and In fact, in an important period like this, tourists are normally willing to pay at an outrageous high prices without much hesitation, which helps turn huge profits for the local tourist industry businesses make substantial profit. In addition to this, if a country organizes the event successfully, it will create a positive image of itself. in foreign citizens’ views. As a result, more people would get to know about that country and possibilities are they would travel to the country or even invest in it.

Conversely, with a large number of tourists coming in, the host nation might face the some problems. One is that of increased pollution. One main reason is that there would be an enormous amount of garbage discarded by those tourists. And this, when combined with the lack of responsibilities, will imminently pollute the local environment. In fact, there is a number of tourist attractions around the world that are being polluted by irresponsible tourists, including Ha Long Bay. [ 1]

-----------------------------------------------------------------

[ 1]: That’s repetitive, and the pollution in Ha Long Bay is not a good example, because it has nothing to do with international sporting events. Instead, you can talk about how in some cases, countries spend more than what such events can generate, or that if such events are canceled, the loss is immense (e.g. if the Tokyo Olympics get canceled in 2021).

For the conclusion, just write one or two concise sentences to summarize the main points from the body paragraphs.

Revise your essay and repost it below if you like.

Please review my second version.

Some people assert that hosting a major international sporting event can bring benefits to a country, whereas others point to the disadvantages. My view is that the downsides are overshadowed by the benefits.

There are clear economic benefits to hosting an international sports competition. First, there would be a tremendous number of tourists visiting the country, and this is definitely beneficial for its economy. During such events, the price of accommodation, food, entertainment, and other services will rise astronomically, as demand skyrockets and tourists are normally willing to pay high prices without much hesitation, which helps the local businesses make substantial profit. In addition to this, if a country organizes the event successfully, it will create a positive image of itself. As a result, more people would get to know about that country and would travel to or even invest in it.

Conversely, with a large number of tourists coming in, the host nation might face some problems. One is that of increased pollution. There is no denying the fact that not many tourists are aware of their responsibilities to protect the environment. As a result, the enormous number of garbage littered by those tourists might be an impediment to making the event successful, thereby, defiling the country’s image. Furthermore, having such a huge number of tourists may aggravate the problem of traffic congestion. Since the demand for traveling surges precipitously, the number of vehicles will rise in line with it.

In conclusion, despite the aforementioned problems, I think that the benefits are more significant. This is because I believe that a country can mitigate those problems by making the law about the environment more strict and improving its transport infrastructure.

Students: Are you brave enough to let our tutors analyse your pronunciation?

Some people assert that hosting a major international sporting event can bring benefits to a country, whereas others point to the disadvantages. My view is that the downsides are overshadowed by the benefits.

Conversely, with a large number of tourists coming in, the host nation might face some problems. One is that of increased pollution. There is no denying the fact that not many tourists are aware of their responsibilities to protect the environment. As a result, the enormous number amount of garbage littered and waste from by those tourists can pollute the environment and local waterways and theaten vulnerable ecosystems, might be an impediment to making the event successful, thereby, defiling tarnishing the country’s image. Furthermore, having such a huge number of tourists large inflow of visitors may aggravate the problem of traffic congestion. Since the demand for traveling surges precipitously, the number of vehicles will rise in line with it.

[ 1] Nevertheless, there are clear economic benefits to hosting an international sports competition. First, there would be a tremendous number of tourists visiting the country, and this is definitely beneficial for its economy. During such events, the price of accommodation, food, entertainment, and other services will rise astronomically, as demand skyrockets and tourists are normally willing to pay high prices without much hesitation, which helps the local businesses make substantial profit. In addition to this, if a country organizes the event successfully, it will create a positive image of itself. As a result, more people would get to know about that country and would travel to or even invest in it.

[ 2] In conclusion, despite the aforementioned problems, I think that the benefits are more significant. This is because I believe that a country can mitigate those problems by making the law about the environment more strict and improving its transport infrastructure.

--------------------------------------------------------

[ 1]: I switched your body paragraphs around. Normally, we start with the opposing view, then counter with our own.

[ 2]: Avoid writing a meaningless generic conclusion. More importantly, do not introduce new ideas in a conclusion. Instead, summarize in a sentence or two the main points from your body paragraphs. For example:

In conclusion, although hosting a major international sporting event can lead to increased pollution and exacerbate traffic congestion, it is a unique opportunity for economic growth and for promoting a positive image of the country.

thank you so much