Question:
Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later. Some people think that having these people to give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about dangers of committing a crime.
Do you agree or disagree?
My essay:
Nowadays, some prison convicts become kind citizens after they have gone to jail. For this view, some argue that the most effective way to talk about how dangerous it is to break the law is to let these individuals deliver speeches to students at educational establishments. Personally speaking, I agree with this perspective.
To begin with, it seems to be persuasive to have former prisoners being well rehabilitated go to school in order to give young students talks because they directly got involved in crime. Nothing is more straightforward and authentic than insiders revealing their own stories. As past criminals are in such learning environments, they can narrate in detail what preventive measures they need to prepare to avoid taking part in unlawful acts. If they were even engaged in committing crimes inadvertently, they would already know how to contact right people who can save them from potential dangers.
In addition, those who used to commit offences succeeding after time in prison should give presentations to young individuals still studying in school because of the fact that they can provide practical life lessons for those persons. Particularly, they can alarm the prices that people must pay if they lapse into criminality. For example, missing opportunities of continuing to pursue their education as well as getting together with family members could be taken into account. As an extreme consequence, they might live to regret past mistakes. By anticipating severe consequences that a man could face, they can raise awareness and limit as much intention to participate in wrongdoings as possible.
In conclusion, I advocate the opinion that advising old lawbreakers with good character to make speeches serves as the best deterrent to school students owing to some significant advantages, namely some viable solutions and savvy life experiences.
Nowadays, some prison ex-convicts become kind (wrong word) honest / upstanding citizens after they have served their time and have been released. gone to jail. (You did not paraphrase this task correctly.) For this view, Some argue that the most effective way to talk about how dangerous it is to break the law is to let these individuals deliver speeches (not a good word here - Talking with students in small groups is far better than giving a speech. Kids don't listen to speeches..) to students at educational establishments. (not a natural phrase. "Students" is enough.) Personally speaking, I agree with this perspective.
To begin with, it seems to be a good idea persuasive to have former prisoners who are being well rehabilitated go to school in order to give young students talks because they directly were got involved in crime. Nothing is more straightforward and authentic than insiders revealing their own stories. As past criminals are in such learning environments, That does not make sense. The criminals are not students.) When they are invited to schools with impressionable teenagers, they can narrate in detail what preventive measures they need to watch out for prepare to avoid taking part in unlawful acts. They can describe what it is like to be locked up in prison and lose all freedoms. Young people are frequently reckless because they believe they will not be caught and punished. Ex-convicts can give them a graphic picture of their experience with the justice system first hand. If they were even engaged in committing crimes inadvertently, they would already know how to contact right people who can save them from potential dangers. (That does not make sense.)
In addition, those who used to commit offences succeeding after time in prison should give presentations to young individuals still studying in school because of the fact that they can provide practical life lessons for those persons. Particularly, they can alarm the prices (wrong expression) that people must pay if they lapse into criminality, for example, missing opportunities of continuing to pursue their education as well as getting together with family members could be taken into account. As an extreme consequence, they might live to regret past mistakes. By anticipating severe consequences that a man could face, they can raise awareness and limit as much intention to participate in wrongdoings as possible.
In conclusion, I advocate the opinion that advising old lawbreakers with good character to make speeches serves as the best deterrent to school students (awkward) owing to some significant advantages, namely giving them insights into what it is like to be incarcerated and what a heavy price they will pay. some viable solutions and savvy life experiences.
Anyone can help me review this essay?
((
Thank you a lot
Based your feedback, I have just completed the new version of that esssay. Could you take a look again?
Nowadays, some ex-convicts become upstanding citizens after they have served their time and have been released. Some argue that the most effective way to talk about how dangerous it is to break the law is to let these individuals deliver talks to. Personally speaking, I agree with this.
To begin with, it seems to be a good idea to have former prisoners who are rehabilitated go to school in order to give young students talks because they directly were involved in crime. Nothing is more straightforward and authentic than insiders revealing their own stories. When they are invited to schools with impressionable teenagers, they can narrate in detail what they need to watch out for to avoid taking part in unlawful acts. They can describe what it is like to be locked up in prison and lose all freedoms. Young people are frequently reckless because they believe they will not be caught and punished. Ex-convicts can give them a graphic picture of their experience with the justice system first hand.
In addition, those who used to commit offences succeeding after time in prison should give presentations to young individuals still studying in school because of the fact that they can provide practical life lessons for those persons. Particularly, ex-prisoners can warn off lapsing into criminality because it makes offenders have to pay expensive prices, for example, missing opportunities of continuing to pursue their education as well as getting together with family members. As an extreme consequence, they might live to regret past mistakes. By anticipating severe impacts that the young could face, they can raise awareness and restrict as much intention to engage in wrongdoings as possible.
In conclusion, I advocate the opinion that soliciting past lawbreakers with good character to present their own experiences serves as the best deterrent to pupils owing to some significant advantages, namely giving them insights into what it is like to be incarcerated and what a heavy price they will pay.
Nowadays,Some ex-convicts become upstanding citizens after they have served their time and have been released. Some people argue that the most effective way to talk to students about how dangerous it is to break the law is to let these individuals go into the schools to present their stories about crime, punishment and rehabilitation.deliver talks to. Personally speaking, I agree with this.To begin with, it seems to be a good idea to have former prisoners who are rehabilitated
go to school in order togive young students talks about their experiences because they directly were involved in crime. Nothing is more straightforward and authentic than insiders revealing their own personal history. stories. (repetitive) When they are invited to schools with impressionable teenagers, they can narrate in detail what they need to watch out for to avoid taking part in unlawful acts. They can describe what it is like to be locked up in prison and lose all freedoms. Young people are frequently reckless because they believe they will not be caught and punished. Ex-convicts can give them a graphic picture of their experience with the justice system first hand.In addition,
those who used to commit offencesex-offenders who succeedingin society after their time in prison should give presentations to young individuals still studying in school becauseof the fact thatthey can provide practical life lessonsfor those persons. Particularly,ex-prisonersthey can warnoffjuveniles about lapsing into criminality becauseit makesoffenders have to pay a heavy price / dearlyexpensiveprices, for example, missing opportunities of continuing to pursue their education as well as getting together with family members. As an extreme consequence, they mightlive toregret past mistakes for the rest of their life. By anticipating severe impacts that the young could face, they can raise awareness andrestrict as much intention(That makes no sense.) frighten them so much that they will nevertoengage in any wrongdoings.as possible.In conclusion, I advocate
the opinion thatsoliciting past lawbreakers with good character to present their own experiences as it serves as the best deterrent to teenagerspupils (wrong word) owing to some significant advantages, namely giving them insights into what it is like to be incarcerated and what a heavy price they will pay.Here are some pupils with their teachers in an American classroom.
Here are some students with their laptops in an American classroom.
Thanks a lot.