Hello. Today we all are eyewitnesses of a new circuit of the old conflict between two civilizations western and eastern (Muslim). Arabs all over the world set on fire flags of western countries threaten taking hostages and breaking down western embassies. All this began due to printing some ridiculous pictures of the Muslim prophet in western press.

Who is guilty for this new round of the conflict? Is this a proper reaction of Arab countries to show their resentment?( if it is any base for a resentment at all ) Is this a reaction that belongs to civilized people or to barbarians which are the main threat of democracy ever? If it is the last, the question how we (the free world) should act how we can restrict such a behavior that may lead to worse consequences including death of innocent people. The last is that many Arab’s terrorist organizations want, waiting for every reason to continue bloodshed and by doing so warm up the world
to a new war!

Im sure that these religious fanatics must be stopped at all costs because if they won't be stopped now after will be too late. It is the same situation as was before WW2 when world closed eyes on what was going on in Nazi Germany and when it opened them it was too late.

here are all pictures, thanks to free press and internet
http://www.michellemalkin.com/archives/004413.htm

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Anonymous

two civilizations western and eastern (Muslim).

I see, you are saying there are two civilizations. Don't you? Then, I think each civilization must pay enough attention not to provoke the people of the other one.

Anonymous

Who is guilty for this new round of the conflict?

I think no one. But IMHO, it is the fault of the committee (if anyone exists) which established these general freedom rules without making enough effort to include respect and other's religion and beliefs.

Anonymous

Is this a proper reaction of Arab countries to show their resentment?

If you were in there position, what would you do? I can tell you, you will do the same thing.

Why, let me put in the context. At least, most of the world listens to your opinions, and helps you find solutions; in contrast nobody listens to them, or tries to understand their problems. Your essential rights are well protected, on the other hand nobody take there rights seriously. You have the appropriate freedom to express you point of view (especially when it is against the government) and you can protest, they are very suppressed by their governments, and can’t even protest against the export of their own vegetables (to give you an example).

What they have left for them, if any, it their religion, the last valuable card in their hand. Those people can afford any kind of nasty life (which they do live right now) but they can accept anybody approaching their religion, and this action is not justified for any reason.

So, believe me, that anybody tries to approach this final card will be defeated to the very end.

Anonymous

Is this a reaction that belongs to civilized people or to barbarians which are the main threat of democracy ever?

Don't you think that three and a half months are enough to reach a compromise, but when nothing happens especially in a case where a word of regret will solve the problem ever? Surly the result is what you see now.

Anonymous

how we (the free world) should act

I am wondering which classification book you are reading in to have such a rule “we the free world”, I really don't get it, but who told you that you are the free world? And again if such ideas, like you, will continue to rise up to the surface, this conflict will be widening to the unlimited. I urge you to dismiss these sentences (and may I say these ideas, although it is your own freedom not to) from the context of global conversation to avoid such a conflict.

Anonymous

how we can restrict such a behavior that may lead to worse consequences including death of innocent people.

Pretty easy things, you have to make appropriate modification to the freedom rules, to include well respect to other religions and belief in this world, which we are all share.

Anonymous

The last is that many Arab’s terrorist organizations want, waiting for every reason to continue bloodshed and by doing so warm up the world to a new war!

Im sure that these religious fanatics must be stopped at all costs because if they won't be stopped now after will be too late.

You are right in this point, and I am urging everybody not to take such action from now up, learn the lesson of the Danish. And don't try to give them (I mean Arab’s terrorists as you call them) reasons to do so. Because I think they will do it very badly, more than you might wonder of.
Anonymous

It is the same situation as was before WW2 when world closed eyes on what was going on in Nazi Germany and when it opened them it was too late.

I will not comment on that to keep something for the others.

Here, I am not trying to impose my ideas on the topic, but I believe everybody need to understand the other’s points of view, in order to coexists in the same world peacefully.

If you reach this line, I thank you for making the effort of reading my comments, and I am very open to discuss any further topic. With much of love and respect to anyone in this world.

But for now good bye.

Hello, Anon,

I think that was just a provocation.

By the way, the subject is already being discussed.

[url=http://www.englishforums.com/English/DepictionOfMohammed/czbhb/Post.htm ]Depiction Of Mohammed[/url]
Try out our live chat room.
Anonymous

two civilizations western and eastern (Muslim).

I see, you are saying there are two civilizations. Don't you? Then, I think each civilization must pay enough attention not to provoke the people of the other one.

Anonymous

Who is guilty for this new round of the conflict?

I think no one. But IMHO, it is the fault of the committee (if anyone exists) which established these general freedom standards without making enough effort to include respect and other's religion and beliefs.

Anonymous

Is this a proper reaction of Arab countries to show their resentment?

If you were in there position, what would you do? I can tell you, you will do the same thing.

Why, let me put you in the context. At least, most of the world listens to your opinions, and helps you find solutions; in contrast nobody listens to them, or tries to understand their problems. Your essential rights are well protected, on the other hand nobody take there rights seriously. You have the appropriate freedom to express you point of view (especially when it is against the government) and you can protest, they are very suppressed by their governments, and can’t even protest against the export of their own vegetables (to give you an example).

What they have left for them, if any, it is their religion, the last valuable card in their hand. Those people can afford any kind of nasty life (which they do live right now) but they can accept anybody approaching their religion, and this action is not justified for any reason.

So, believe me, that anybody tries to approach this final card will be defeated to the very end.

Anonymous

Is this a reaction that belongs to civilized people or to barbarians which are the main threat of democracy ever?

Don't you think that three and a half months are enough to reach a compromise, but when nothing happens especially in a case where a word of regret will solve the problem ever? Surly the result is what you see now.

Anonymous

how we (the free world) should act

I am wondering in which classification book you are reading to have such a statment “we the free world”, I really don't get it, but who told you that you are the free world? But again, if such ideas, like the one you just mentioned, will continue to rise up to the surface, this conflict will be widening to the unlimited. I urge you to dismiss these sentences (and may I say these ideas, although it is your own freedom not to) from the context of global conversation to avoid such a conflict.

Anonymous

how we can restrict such a behavior that may lead to worse consequences including death of innocent people.

Pretty easy things, you have to make appropriate modification to the freedom standards, to include well respect to other religions and belief in this world, which we are all share.

Anonymous

The last is that many Arab’s terrorist organizations want, waiting for every reason to continue bloodshed and by doing so warm up the world to a new war!

Im sure that these religious fanatics must be stopped at all costs because if they won't be stopped now after will be too late.

You are right in this point, and I am urging everybody not to take such action from now up, learn the lesson of the Danish. And don't try to give them (I mean Arab’s terrorists as you call them) reasons to do so. Because I think they will do it very badly, more than you might wonder of.
Anonymous

It is the same situation as was before WW2 when world closed eyes on what was going on in Nazi Germany and when it opened them it was too late.

I will not comment on that to keep something for the others.

Here, I am not trying to impose my ideas on the topic, but I believe everybody need to understand the other’s points of view, in order to coexists in the same world peacefully.

If you reach this line, I thank you for making the effort of reading my comments, and I am very open to discuss any further topic with much of love and respect to anyone in this world.

But for now good bye.
Firas, why haven't you written what country you are from?
FirasPretty easy things, you have to make appropriate modification to the freedom standards, to include well respect to other religions and belief in this world, which we are all share.
Well, agree, but I can't understand if Muslims esteem other religions. Let me explain. They have the concept "infidel" whereas no other widely-distributed religion has it, as far as I know.
Ruslana
FirasPretty easy things, you have to make appropriate modification to the freedom standards, to include well respect to other religions and belief in this world, which we are all share.
Well, agree, but I can't understand if Muslims esteem other religions. Let me explain. They have the concept "infidel" whereas no other widely-distributed religion has it, as far as I know.

I didn't get your point? What do you mean by "infidel", can you give me a case for example?

BTW, I can tell you for sure that if a Muslim does not respect other divine religions, he is not a real Muslim.
Site Hint: Check out our list of pronunciation videos.
actually i couldnt understand why did you pay so much attention to this word ruslana.

infidel means people who are not in the same religion with you. not only for Muslim's case. it s a general word. For Christians we are (i am Muslim) infidels ,too.

i think this doesnt show that Muslims dont esteem to other people in other religions.

as for anonymous i can see you are not enough serious to such an important matter . one can see it by just looking the head of the subject that you have written.

regards.
Firas
Ruslana
FirasPretty easy things, you have to make appropriate modification to the freedom standards, to include well respect to other religions and belief in this world, which we are all share.
Well, agree, but I can't understand if Muslims esteem other religions. Let me explain. They have the concept "infidel" whereas no other widely-distributed religion has it, as far as I know.

I didn't get your point? What do you mean by "infidel", can you give me a case for example?

BTW, I can tell you for sure that if a Muslim does not respect other divine religions, he is not a real Muslim.

Folks,

May I suggest we don't get deep inside any specific religion? This way, we can avoid the chances of offending someone.
i m angry about the denmark cartoons!
Students: Are you brave enough to let our tutors analyse your pronunciation?
Show more