Protecting Wild Animals And Birds

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion?

It is widely argued that preserving wild creatures has consumed resources and attention. Personally, I completely disagree with the opinion because there are many reasons why people should spend more and more resources protecting wildlife.

One of the reasons is that humans should be responsible for their actions, which cause detrimental damage to the natural habitats of wild animals and birds. There is no denying that the number and diversity of species in wildlife have been severely decreased by the overexploitation and overconsumption of people throughout the world. People are always finding plausible reasons for impairing the environment, such as hunting for recreation and deforestation for agricultural development. If people do not manage to address the environmental issues, their next generations will no longer have the opportunity to immerse themselves in or observe those kinds of fauna.

Another reason is that protecting wild creatures can result in many significant benefits. Firstly, this will help to improve the biodiversity, which could lead to the flourishing growth of other kinds of species. If the local governments are likely to encourage them to combine protecting the wildlife with running small businesses based on the products and resources of these places, it will allow them to increase their income and have a better life. Furthermore, using all the resources that they have to save wild animals will make their descendants more aware of environmental protection. Thus, these expenditures are totally worthwhile and beneficial for not only the environment but also for people in the long term.

In conclusion, I totally disagree with a group of people who think that protecting wild creatures is overly focused and useless. When it comes to responsibility and long-term benefits, people should manage to do more to save their later lives.

(292 words)