Some People Feel That Manufacturers And Supermarkets Have The Responsibility To Reduce The Amount Of Packaging Of Goods. Others Argue That Customers Should Avoid Buying Goods With A Lot Of Packaging. Discuss Both Views And Give Your Opinion.

Packaging plays an important role in preserving food, protecting it from external contamination influences, (wrong word) and transporting food (Packaging does not carry the food to your home, does it?.) from supermarkets to our homes. However, it can be a problem for the environment if it is not biodegradable. stumbling block in the process (wrong word) of environmental protection. Consequently, there is some an opinion that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods but from another perspective, customers should avoid buying goods with excessive an influx (wrong word) of packaging. In my opinion, both parties have to work together to reduce the amount of waste, especially plastic. In this essay, I will explore both views and give my opinion.

On the one hand, people need to get to the root of the problem in order to solve it, solve problems from their roots, (wrong expression of this idiom) and in this case, it is the supermarket that distributes all kinds of packaging (wrong idea. Supermarkets do sell packaging materials such as bubble wrap and envelopes, but that is not the topic here. ) wraps meat or fresh vegetables in plastic containers, so it must have the primary responsibility in decreasing the number (wrong word - number is for countable items. "packaging is non-count.) amount of packaging. To begin with, it is worth considering that (Avoid these useless dummy-it clauses. They are only distracting. They add nothing to your argument.) only the quality of the product creates its value, not the wrapping. Therefore, reducing the amount (wrong word - amount is for non-count items. "Bags" is countable.) number of nylon plastic bags does not decrease the sales because if the quality is good, the shoppers will come back again. for the second time. Another point worth noting is that markets Furthermore, stores do not need to eliminate nylon plastic bags, but they can diminish their the environmental impact roles (wrong word) by offering biodegradable using alternative substances such as bags made from paper or reusable bags made of cloth or nylon. straw, cloth, and so on. (Do not use "..." or "etc." or phrases such as "and so on" in formal writing. Write a complete idea.) This will not only protect the environment but can also attract customers with these beautiful bags with colorful logos or designs.

These are examples of eco-friendly reusable, washable, and sturdy nylon shopping bags.

On the other hand, if there is only the participation of manufacturers, It does not make sense. Because Using packaging or not is based on the consciousness of each customer. Accordingly, consumers can buy products in bulk so that the products can be packed in a single package. In addition, people place a high value on using biodegradable shopping bags, because we cannot immediately get rid of them, (I do not understand. Why should we get rid of eco-friendly, biodegradable shopping bags?) but phase them out gradually.

To sum up, wrapping (wrong word) excess plastic packaging causes harm to the environment, so both consumers and manufacturers should jointly try to reduce or replace it with more reusable or eco-friendly materials. remove it.