Which do you think is correct, a or b?
An acorn, left to itself becomes an oak, and a geneticist ___ its DNA to make it grow into an elm may justly be said ___ with its natural course.
A) altering / to have interfered
B) having altered / to interfere
C) to alter / having interfered
D) being altered / interfered
E) to have altered / to be interfering
An acorn, left to itself becomes an oak, and a geneticist ___ its DNA to make it grow into an elm may justly be said ___ with its natural course.
A) altering / to have interfered
B) having altered / to interfere
C) to alter / having interfered
D) being altered / interfered
E) to have altered / to be interfering
Comments
Which do you think is correct, a or b?
An acorn, left to itself becomes an oak, and a geneticist ___ its DNA to make it grow into an elm may justly be said ___ with its natural course.
A) altering / to have interfered
B) having altered / to interfere
A.
Best wishes, Clive
Ikia
To do that with B, you'd have to change it to having altered / to have interfered in my opinion
Best wishes, Clive
An acorn, left to itself becomes an oak, and a geneticist altering its DNA to make it grow into an elm may justly be said to have interfered with its natural course.
The thing I wonder, which one would you choose to say something similar?
It may justly be said that a geneticist who alters the DNA of an acorn (which becomes an oak when it is left to itself) to make it grow into an elm has interfered with its natural course.
It may justly be said that a geneticist who has altered the DNA of an acorn (which becomes an oak when it is left to itself) to make it grow into an elm interferes with its natural course.
It may justly be said that a geneticist who has altered the DNA of an acorn (which becomes an oak when it is left to itself) to make it grow into an elm has interfered with its natural course.
It may justly be said that a geneticist who alteres the DNA of an acorn (which becomes an oak when it is left to itself) to make it grow into an elm interferes with its natural course.
It is a most interesting question.
It may justly be said that a geneticist who alters the DNA of an acorn (which becomes an oak when it is left to itself) to make it grow into an elm has interfered with its natural course.
Kind regards,
Goldmund
paco