Hi guys,yesterday I saw the Da Vinci code,and I like to give you some impressions!

First of all,the film is good [Y],and I think Ron Howard did a nice job,even if the movie is not as supermegafantastic as the newspapers wrote. It follows the plot of the book,and there are not great changes,anyway,there are little "reality" mistakes,for instance: can a car be quick as a plane,and can a plane be driven as a car?!..it's strange!

Secondly,the action scenes are a bit weak,I mean impossible (why do they use a Smart for a car escape?! Emotion: hmm),the rest of them are beautiful (I fall in love with the last one);about photography and editing,they're not so good,a bit senseless.The music is great,instead!!

Finally,Tom Hanks is a good actor as usually,and Audrey Tatou played well,but the difference between them is clear as the water,and even the other actors did a good job (McKellen/Reno)!Make attention on Silas,he's scaring,relly scaring!! Emotion: indifferent

Personally I give "Emotion: starEmotion: starEmotion: starand a half /5 stars" to the movie,and I suggest you to go to the cinema and watch it! Emotion: wink

Regards Emotion: big smile

PS..it's only a movie,not true history,so watch it only as a film!
1 2
I'm looking forward to watching it. Thank you for your comments. [H]
You're welcome Steven Mc! I have to say that I'm sorry because I haven't been so clear on writing my description... Emotion: embarrassed
Students: We have free audio pronunciation exercises.
Thanks Nyla! I think your description is very clear! Well...I'm going to watch it in a couple of hours and tomorrow I will say what I think about it; I liked the book very much and I think you're right: we have to read/watch it as a simple story, frankly I am so tired to listen all the controversies about this!!! See you tomorrow Emotion: wink
Here again as I promised! I liked the movie, and as Nyla told there are some imprecisions but I guess it is due to the fact that it's hard to make a 2:30 hours movie on a such long full of details story...by the way I could tolerate this lack of precision. I liked all the actors, a very good cast. I liked the music, that is by Hans Zimmer (who composed Pearl Harbor OST). Last thing: maybe if I had not read the book I have appreciated more the suspence and unexpected events Emotion: wink
Tahnks Nyla.

R..K.Emotion: smile
Teachers: We supply a list of EFL job vacancies
hey! nyla

your comment on the film impressed me a lot. i agree with you except for a few things.i love tom hanks, but for the hero he seems a little oldder. you know in the book the hero is a handsome young man. the media really gives too much boost to it.
Vicky23hey! nyla

your comment on the film impressed me a lot. i agree with you except for a few things.i love tom hanks, but for the hero he seems a little oldder. you know in the book the hero is a handsome young man. the media really gives too much boost to it.
Thank you Vicky23!I tried to do my best to describe you shortly the film!By the way,even if Tom Hanks played very well in the movie,I must agree with you when you say that it's a bit too older for his role..mmh..but I think I can forgive him for being so old..hehe.. Emotion: stick out tongueEmotion: wink
hi, Nyla!

glad to share with you my opinions.

i can forgive him for being old too. who can't? in fact the age adds to his charm.

you know clint eastwood,
Students: Are you brave enough to let our tutors analyse your pronunciation?
Show more